Skip to content
Error
  • JUser::_load: Unable to load user with id: 426

Joe the Terrorist

Published on: Thursday, February 18, 2010

We'll soon be hearing more than we ever needed to know about Joseph Andrew Stack III, the man who burned up his house and flew a suicide mission into an Austin IRS office this morning. We'll no doubt discover that neighbors and friends are shocked; that he was a quiet fellow, kept to himself, nobody imagined ... you know, the usual. Meanwhile, folks in the left-wing and right-wing media will be furiously spinning Stack and his six-page suicide note into an object lesson about the dangerous tendencies of—take your pick—anti-government tea-partyers or left-wingnuts in "socialist" enclaves like the Austin area.

Stack's self-described suicide "rant," discovered on his Web site before the FBI shut it down, provides fodder for either side to pick up and run with. If you want to lay his actions at the door of the radical elements in the tea-party movement, you can pick out some of Stack's words—calling the U.S. government a "totalitarian regime," for instance, or sounding like a tea-party keynote speaker when he writes that "In a government full of hypocrites from top to bottom, life is as cheap as their lies and their self-serving laws."

But that could also be language from an anti-war rally. And while we might yet find that he was a member of the Texas Nationalist Movement or some such right-wing group, Stack hardly sounds like your typical John Bircher. Along with his detailed litany of IRS woes, he complains about "the joke we call the American medical system" and the failure to enact health-care reform ("It's clear they see no crisis as long as the dead people don't get in the way of their corporate profits rolling in"). Hardly striking a white-supremacist note, he writes that "It has always been a myth that people have stopped dying for their freedom in this country, and it isn't limited to the blacks, and poor immigrants."

And there is a serious populist critique—one shared by many on the left and right and in the middle—of the bank bailout as a symbol of America's having been sold to corporations and the wealthy. "I remember reading about the stock market crash before the 'great' depression and how there were wealthy bankers and businessmen jumping out of windows when they realized they screwed up and lost everything. Isn't it ironic how far we've come in 60 years in this country that they now know how to fix that little economic problem; they just steal from the middle class (who doesn't have any say in it, elections are a joke) to cover their asses and it's 'business-as-usual.' "

And then there is Stack's closing note:

"The communist creed: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.

"The capitalist creed: From each according to his gullibility, to each according to his greed."

You could hardly get further from the tea-party right than this. Hatred of government is a staple of the movement; a loathing of capitalism is antithetical to it. For the tea-party rank-and-file, capitalism—pure, unfettered, libertarian—is the panacea for all ills, and government is the evil force that prevents free markets from exercising their universal benevolence.

We might yet learn that there's something deeply political or ideological behind Stack's apparent act of domestic terrorism. But his own words of explanation don't lend themselves to that kind of pat assumption. Stack appears to have been a frustrated middle-American with a tragic screw loose.

Maybe it's true that the anti-government venom of the right helped tip Stack over into violence. Then again, maybe it would have happened anyway. And maybe, in the end, the scariest and saddest thing is that a good deal of what this suicidal 54-year-old had to say was not mere ideological jibberish: Stack's words are those of an unhinged man who felt caught up in a system that, while not as hopeless as he'd concluded, is undoubtedly deeply unjust. And his death, no matter his twisted intentions, won't change it one whit.

Rate this article:
(24 votes)
Bob Moser

Bob Moser

Bob Moser has been editor since October 2008. A native North Carolinian, he edited the Independent Weekly before being named a Knight Fellow at Stanford University. Bob has been a senior writer for the Southern Poverty Law Center and a senior editor at The Nation. He's the author of Blue Dixie: Awakening the South's Democratic Majority.

Website: www.texasobserver.org/purpletexas E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

3 comments

  • Nus Adirolf Nus Adirolf @ 7:59PM on 02.28.10 Comment Link

    Nature's Manifesto is better than the Creeds in Joe Stack's Manifesto: Time to transcend the animosity, and plant a righteous seed. Time to manifest our divinity, thereby the world we'll feed. Time to abandon concepts dim-witty, like war which makes us bleed. Time to end Mammonic authority, from which we must be freed. Time to share the commons in equity, love neighbor as best deed. Time to show Comm and Cap Creeds no pity, abandon them with speed. Time to nourish and bless humanity, just bear good fruit not weed. Time to promote peace, joy and sanity, the Laws of Nature heed.

  • Roger  Baker Roger Baker @ 3:07PM on 02.20.10 Comment Link

    I think people have gotten used to a false political dichotomy concerning our two major parties. The two parties no longer have a meaningful platform; they are both corrupted. The Congressional Democrats are caving into corporate and banking interests and blocking basic reform, as detailed here by Business Week: http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/10_02/b4162024080832.htm "Not So Radical Reform -- How New Democrats and Wall Street are watering down financial regulation in Congress" One result of a dysfunctional political process resistant to reform is that whatever kind of reform, whether banking or health care, that comes out of Congress is likely to be carefully contrived to benefit the big money as usual. It seems that the richest 1%, have gotten control of most of the wealth, see this two part piece: http://www.alternet.org/economy/145667/ "The Economic Elite Have Engineered an Extraordinary Coup, Threatening the Very Existence of the Middle Class" This being the case, a conflict naturally arises between the interests of the broad general public, versus a corrupted government unresponsive to reform. I think the 80% on the bottom end of the income scale (or a big majority), including potentially most tea baggers and progressives, need to SOMEHOW create a united front to take the corporate and banking domination out of government. This would make a wise and proper solution infinitely easier. One way to turn up the pressure is by being really noisy and getting an updated version of the big antiwar-type marches cranked up again. It is hard to imagine a giant march on Washington calling for banking reform, but it could maybe be combined with a call for tax reform to get broad support. A real US economic recovery still remains in serious doubt. There is now so much anti-government discontent building up that it will no doubt find some new and unpredictable voice of expression. No justice, no peace.

  • Travis Willmann Travis Willmann @ 3:25PM on 02.19.10 Comment Link

    I read those last two sentences in a slightly different way: as a juxtaposition, but also as Stack's closing argument that he has been presented two untenable choices, the postscript to which was his violent act yesterday.

Please LOGIN to make comments. Not a registered user? REGISTER now!