Texas (Kinda, Sorta) Accidentally Decriminalized Weed. Now What?

How harshly you’re punished for pot possession depends on where you’re caught, even more so now that a new law legalizing hemp has sowed confusion.

An industrial hemp plant.
An industrial hemp plant. Wikimedia

How harshly you’re punished for pot possession depends on where you’re caught, even more so now that a new law legalizing hemp has sowed confusion.

An industrial hemp plant.
An industrial hemp plant. Wikimedia

Texas lawmakers like to declare themselves leaders on criminal justice reform, but this session they mostly did nothing about it. During the 86th Texas Legislature, a barrage of misinformation from police groups killed bipartisan efforts to reform Texas’ marijuana laws, which remain some of the harshest in the country. Still, there’s a silver lining to lawmakers’ failed attempts at pot reform: They may have kinda, sorta, accidentally decriminalized it across large sections of the state.

That’s because when lawmakers legalized hemp this session, they unintentionally changed the legal definition of marijuana in a way that makes possession harder to prosecute. Under the new law, which went into effect in June, cannabis with less than 0.3 percent concentration of THC, the psychoactive ingredient that gets you high, is legal hemp, while anything above that threshold is illegal marijuana. Since crime labs in the state can’t currently determine THC concentrations at the minimum threshold, the Texas District and County Attorneys Association predicted that agencies across the state would have to purchase pricey new equipment to keep charging for pot possession. “Until then, there will be no easy way to determine whether the weed your officers seized is illegal marijuana,” the association wrote in a June bulletin to its members.

State Representative Joe Moody, D-El Paso
State Representative Joe Moody, D-El Paso, sponsored House Bill 63, a marijuana decriminalization bill, in the 2019 legislative session. The bill passed the House, but Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick killed the legislation in the Senate.  Kolten Parker

In response, prosecutors in some of Texas’ largest counties began tossing petty pot possession cases. Many have said they won’t accept new ones until officials resolve the testing issue. While it’s still unclear how much time or money that will take, Texas’ GOP leaders aren’t thrilled with the new legal limbo. A July letter signed by Governor Greg Abbott, Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, Texas House Speaker Dennis Bonnen, and Attorney General Ken Paxton scolded prosecutors for going soft on pot. “Failing to enforce marijuana laws cannot be blamed on legislation that did not decriminalize marijuana in Texas,” they wrote.

The episode highlights the uneven patchwork of marijuana enforcement that already existed in Texas. How harshly you’re punished for pot possession depends on where you’re caught, even more so now. In Hays County, where marijuana possession has been the leading charge for years, officials have vowed to keep prosecuting low-level pot cases. Harris County, one of the jurisdictions now refusing to take possession cases, had already implemented a diversion program to keep marijuana offenders out of jail and without a criminal record.

Advocates for marijuana reform hope DAs use the testing snafu to stop prosecuting for possession indefinitely. Last year, Abbott’s own party began to advocate for decriminalization, while polling from the University of Texas and the Texas Tribune last summer showed a majority of Texas voters support full legalization. “This all just reaffirms what a growing number of Texans already realize,” said Heather Fazio, director of Texans for Responsible Marijuana Policy. “Prosecuting people for low-level marijuana isn’t a good use of resources. Nor is it worth the devastating human consequences that come with a drug conviction.”

READ MORE:

Do you think free access to journalism like this is important? The Texas Observer is known for its fiercely independent, uncompromising work—which we are pleased to provide to the public at no charge in this space. That means we rely on the generosity of our readers who believe that this work is important. You can chip in for as little as 99 cents a month. If you believe in this mission, we need your help.


Michael Barajas is a staff writer covering civil rights for the Observer. You can reach him on Twitter or at [email protected].


You May Also Like:

Top