ustxtxb_obs_1969_12_05_50_00015-00000_000.pdf

Delivery by Christmas can be assured for the following books presently stocked by the Observer, provided the orders are received by December 5th. List Mem. List Mem. Price Price Price Price THE MAKING OF A COUNTER CULTURE Theodore Roszak $ 7.95 $6.36 .. THE SELLING OF THE PRESIDENT 1968 Joe McGinnis NI .atk … AND OTHER DIRTY STORIES Larry L. King $ 5.50 $4.40 $ 5.95 $4.76 kA…4..t. .1 THE JOHN HOWARD GRIFFIN READER THE KENNEDY LEGACY Theodore Sorensen . . . . $ 6.95 $5.56 ROBERT KENNEDY: A MEMOIR Jack Newfield $ 6.95 $5.56 HUNDRED YARD WARD Gary Cartwright $ 5.95 $4.76 TEXAS SKETCHBOOK: IMPRESSIONS OF PEOPLE AND PLACES Elroy Bode $ 5.00 $4.00 %loaNtitAtakt, ,ft.e,% . \\ t&se., A PERSONAL COUNTRY A. C. Greene $ 6.95 $5.56 THE AGONY OF THE AMERICAN LEFT Christopher Lasch .. .. $ 4.95 $3.96 0,,,N -emu..-;,,upw.-vg::eftamt ..-,72.4,4’1: THE GUN THAT MADE THE z>w ,,i :k.,_0.4:V TWENTIES ROAR . 4* 4w, JD:Pa N, …a \\ N 16′,, Bill Helmer . . ._ … .. $ 7.95 ‘ $6.36 THE LITHOGRAPHS OF THOMAS HART BENTON MAXIMUM FEASIBLE MISUNDERSTANDING Daniel. P. Moynihan . . . $ 5.95 4..tka44, VIVA MAX! James Lehrer $4.76 ADVENTURES WITH A TEXAS NATURALIST Roy Bedichek $ 4.50 MrItiav%*CPWM:’ s , et; , A gift-card announcement will acoinpany those books you designate; or, for orders received at the last minute, the anhouncepent, mailed ‘separately ; to assure a timely arrival. Optional membership in the discount plan, at $5.00 for one year, entitles readers to order the above books or Any hardbound book in print \(except text, discount applies to all book purchases made during the 12 months of membership. If possible please enclose payment, including, for Texas residents, the 4 1/4% sales tax, with your order. Books are sent postpaid. A 25c service charge is added only to those orders not accompanied by payment. Buy All Your Books From the Observer carry special weight with Texas voters \(and academic standing affiliated with the chief university of the president’s own state. My reply did not even remotely question anybody’s right to advertise his politico-military views, but \(perhaps value of the opinions of the faculty members concerned, of whom few, if any, appeared to have more competence in the field than most any reasonably well-informed citizen. If, indeed, the academic profession is such a high priesthood that the politico-military propaganda of any professor of French, medieval history, philosophy, or what have you, can be challenged by outsiders only on penalty of sacrilege, then freedom of speech for most Americans is considerably less free than “academic freedom,” or, as George Orwell might put it, some of us are substantially less equal than others! As to Professor Shattuck’s position on the Vietnam war, I did not “insinuate” anything, but said what I did say quite plainly. Later, upon receipt of a letter from him, I replied that if he would tell me he was not opposed to our Vietnam involvement, I would promptly publish a public retraction of my statement to the contrary. My offer was not accepted. I might add a modest word of thanks to the British or ex-British savant for his witty concession that I possess at least the virtue of having once been refused confirmation by the Texas Senate for appointment to the UT board of regents. Oddly enough, the only reason I have ever heard given for the action of the eleven senators in question is that I was a too liberal advocate of greater political unity between Great Britain and the United States! Considering the professor’s obviously limited admiration for so many Texans, I suspect that he might have voted the same way as the eleven senators and for the very same reason \(which, incidentally, would have disturbed me even less than did the fact of W. St. John Garwood, 204 Austin National Bank Bldg., Austin, Tex. 78701. Today’s Revolutionaries Having read with interest . . . Dr. John Sullivan’s “Valedictory,” I sympathize with his British puzzlement over American respect for revolutionaries of the past and obvious disrespect for some contemporary ones. As a descendant of DAR members and other revolutionaries, perhaps I can suggest a solution to the apparent paradox. B y and large, our old-time revolutionaries were totally committed to the business at hand and would brook no collaboration. Could anyone imagine Sam Houston holding a teaching assistantship at the University of Mexico while marching to December 5, 1969 15