ustxtxb_obs_1958_09_05_50_00007-00000_000.pdf

CLASSIFIED WANTED FOR ADOPTION Anglo couple wishes to legally adopt child-preferably, to be born. Replies are assured to be kept confidential. Please send name, address and phone number Observer, 504 W. 24th, Austin 5, Tex. LEGALS CITATION BY PUBLICATION THE STATE OF TEXAS To M. S. Acuff; the legal representatives of M. S. Acuff, if said M. S. Acuff is deceased; the heirs of said M. S. Acuff; the legal representatives of the heirs of said M. S. Acuff; the heirs of the heirs of said M. S. Acuff; the legal representatives of the heirs of the heirs of said M. S. Acuff, each of whom is a defendant in the hereinafter styled and numbered cause: You and each of you are hereby commanded to appear before the 126th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas, to be held at the courthouse of said county, in the City of Austin, Travis County, Texas, at or before 10:00 o’clock A. M., on the first Monday after the expiration of forty-two days from the date of the issuance hereof, that is to say, at or before 10:00 o’clock A. M., on Monday, the 6th day of October, 1958, and answer the petition of plaintiff in Cause No. 111,425, in which C. L. Lindell is plaintiff and M. S. Acuff, and the legal representatiires of M. S. Acuff, if said M. S. Acuff is deceased, and the heirs of said M. S. Acuff, and the legal representatives of the heirs of said M. S. Acuff, and the heirs of the heirs of said M. S. Acuff, and the legal representatives of the heirs of the heirs of said M. S. Acuff are defendants, which petition was filed in said court on the 22 day of August, 1958, and the nature of which said suit is as follows: Being an action and prayer for judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendants for the full title to and possession of Lot No. 16, in Block “N”, in the James E. Bouldin Subdivision of a part of the Isaac Decker League, in the City of Austin, Travis County, Texas, as said lot is shown on the plat of said subdivision of record in Book “1”, at Page 71, of the Plat Records of Travis County, Texas. Plaintiff alleges that he is the owner of the fee simple title to and is entitled to possession of said described real property under the three, five, ten, and twentyfive year statutes of limitation; that defendant on or about August 1, 1958, unlawfully entered upon said tract of land and unlawfully dispossessed plaintiff of same and has continuously since said date unlawfully withheld from plaintiff the possession thereof, to plaintiff’s damage in the sum of $1,500.00. Plaintiff alleges that each defendant is asserting some character of title to or right or interest in said tract of land, which title, right, or interest so asserted arose out of some recorded instrument or decree, or is of a character the exact nature of which is to plaintiff unknown; that such claims of defendants have cast a cloud on plaintiff’s title. Plaintiff prays for order of court removing any cloud cast on plaintiff’s title to said tract of land, for writ of possession, costs of suit, and relief, general and special. All of which more fully appears from plaintiff’s original petition on file in this office, and to which reference is here made. WITNESS, 0. T. MARTIN, JR.. Clerk of the District Courts of Travis County, Texas. Issued and given under my hand and seal of said court at office in the City of Austin, this the 22nd day of August. 1958. 0. T. MARTIN, JR. Clerk, District Court, Travis County, Texas, By GEO. W. BICKLER, Deputy. CITATION BY PUBLICATION THE STATE OF TEXAS TO Furman Watson Defendant, in the hereinafter styled and numbered cause: You are hereby commanded to appear before the 126th District Court of Travis County, Texas, to be held at the courthouse of said county in the City of Austin, Travis County, Texas, at or before 10 o’clock A. M. of the first Monday after the expiration of 42 days from the date of issuance hereof; that is to say, at or before, 10 o’clock A. M. of Monday the 6th day of October, 1958, and answer the petition of plaintiff in Cause Number 111.407, in which Vivian Watson is Plaintiff and Furman Watson is defendant, filed in said Court on the 20th day of August, 1958, and the nature of which said suit is as follows: Being an action and prayer for judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant for decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony heretofore and now existing between said parties; Page 7 September 5, 1958 BOW WILLIAMS Amos:nubile anti General Insurance Budget Payment Plan Strong Stock Companies GReenwood 2-6545 624 LAMAR, AUSTIN Let’s Abolish the Poll Tax! TELEVISION and RADIO REPAIR ARV Electronics Houston, Texas Mission 5-1539 Dick Seinfeld HIGH FIDELITY SALES and INSTALLATION Over $1 1 0 Million Insurance In Force 4-nettrA tweA Y9e INSURANCE COMPANY P. 0. Box 8098 Houston, Texas Candidates Eye 1960; Race Talk Eschewed The Texas Junior Chamber of Commerce is distributing literature to editors in favor of the legislative pay raise and annual sessions constitutional amendment to be voted on in November. Douglas Guthrie, president, noted in a letter that the state Jaycee convention, the State Bar, and the state Democratic Party support the program. E. L. Kurth, president, South land Paper Mills, Inc., of Lufkin, has written Texas “manufacturers and businessmen” urging they support the Manion Forum, which advocates right to work laws and considers liberal Democratic programs socialistic. George Nokes, disappointed but not downcast by his 450,000-vote showing against Lt. Gov. Ben Ramsey, has been listening receptively to friends who have encouraged him to consider a candidacy in 1960. 1 Sen. Henry Gonzalez kept a date to speak at a Young Democrats’ picnic in Dallas recently in spite of the fact he did not make a runoff. Judge Sarah T. Hughes said she may run again for the Texas Supreme Court in 1960. “There was so little difference in the vote that I am encouraged to run again and would appreciate your support,” she said. She polled 566,804 votes, losing by 14,000 to incumbent Justice Joe Greenhill. Just as Greenhill supporters used sharp-edged “anti-CIO” ads in his election, an ad for Robert W. Hamilton in his 294,268to-244,939 victory over J. Edwin Smith quoted a Dallas News editorial calling Smith a “DOT-AFLCIO candidate” and “a Houston labor lawyer lacking in. judicial experience.” / Tom Reavley, former Secre tary of State, is reported telling friends he definitely will run for attorney general in 1960. Roy Whittenburg, Panhandle rancher \(not the publisher, as remarked in the Observer before: started campaigning for the Senate against Ralph Yarborough. Yarborough has moved his Austin headquarters from 12th and Congress up half a block to Charles Johnston’s law offices. / Jerry Holleman, president, v Texas AFL-CIO, told the Corpus Christi Rotary Club: “We have become a nation of political agnostics; we are neutral on the most basic issues. … We are too materialistic. We do not dwell enough on big issues, the things which stimulate man’s imagination and kindle his soul.” Objecting to the “bring indus try to Texas” campaigns, Ernest Joiner in the Rails Banner says, “Nobody, it seems, can stand nature any more, unless he can have enough filth and noise and hubbub to send him to some $50 a day mountain retreat on vacation.” Bob Hollingsworth, analyzing Dallas politics in the Times Herald, said liberals have been gaining steadily. The columnist points out Yarborough got 40 per cent in 1956, and 45.8 percent in cent in 1966, and 45.8 percent in 1958. He says voting strength of precincts won by Yarborough is 56 percent of the total potential for the county; but less than 35 percent of the votes in Yarbor c ugh’s pre::ncts voted, while more than 52 percent of those in Blakley’s precincts voted. Liberals have the troops b.lt haven’t massed them yet. “Liberals, at long last, know it can be done, and they have an example to follow-Harris County,” Hollingsworth said. Jon Ford, in the Express, says more than a third of the 150 House members were endorsed by labor groups. “This is not to say that any large number of the 50plus … are flaming liberals clutching portraits of Miz Frankie Randolph or copies of the Texas Observer as they go about their appointed rounds,” Ford said; but “labor preferred them.” Net effect of liberal gains, as in Houston and Fort Worth, is to “lessen chance for, passage of a sales tax,” Ford wrote. Don Freeman, labor columnist in the Dallas News, accounted for the defeat of labor-backed candidates in Dallas legislative races on grounds that Dallas union members think of their Political Intelligence unions mainly in economic, and not in political, terms. The Dallas News said the move to oust Mrs. R. D. Randolph as national committeewoman “has little to recommend it legally-plenty to recommend it politically,” and if a resolution of this kind is introduced, “it will serve as an issue around which conservatives can unite.” However, Margaret Mayer wrote in the Times-Herald and Abilene Reporter-News that such a resolution “would not” clear the SDEC’s legal subcommittee. Jon Ford said Gov. Daniel’s forces are not for the resolution but aren’t going to say so publicly and take the diverting pressure off the liberals. Houston Press concluded a story on the liberal sweep in the legislative races with this paragraph: “And written large for all to read in the legislative contests was the lesson: “DON’T CAMPAIGN ON RACE AND CLASS PREJUDICE.” Texas Events In September AUSTIN Calendar for September around Texas: Sept. 1-6, central East Texas fair and livestock show; 1-22, Fort Worth, art, Architecture U.S.A.; 2-6, Cleburne, North Central Texas fair and rodeo; 4-6, Kaufman, county livestock show; 5-6, Breckenridge, junior 4-H club rodeo; 5-6, Wellington, Collingsworth county fair; 6, .13, 20, 27, Mesquite, rodeo; 11-13, Lamesa, Dawson County fair; 12-13, Dallas, all Arabian horse show; 12-14, Seguin, Guadalupe farm and livestock fair; 13, Fort Worth, “Battle of Songs”; 13-20, Tyler, East Texas fair; 15-20, Texarkana, Four States fair; 1820, Hempstead, Waller County fair and rodeo; 18-20, Henrietta, reunion and rodeo; 22-27, Amarillo, Tri-State fair; Sept. 22-29, Iowa Park, 4th Army concert band, Texas-Oklahoma fair; 23-27, McKinney, Collin County fair and settlers’ picnic; 23-27, Wharton, county fair; 24-Oct. 2, Houston, ice capades; 25-27, Trinity, community fair; Sept. 25-27, Wharton, youth rodeo; 26-27, Grandbury, Hood County livestock and poultry show; 26-27, New Braunfels, Comal County fair and rodeo; 30, Amarillo, concert, Amarillo symphony, guest artist Carlos Salzedo. \(Excerpted from “Texas Calendar of Events,” Texas Highway Plaintiff alleges cruel treatment on the part of defendant towards her of such nature as to render their further living together as husband and wife altogether insupportable; Plaintiff further alleges that one child was born of said union, for whose care, custody and control plaintiff prays judgment; plaintiff further alleges that no community property was accumulated; Plaintiff further prays for relief, general and special: All of which more fully appears from Plaintiff’s Original Petition on file in this office and to which reference is here made; If this citation is not served within 90 days after date of its issuance, it shall be returned unserved. WITNESS, 0. T. MARTIN, JR., Clerk of the District Courts of Travis County, Texas. Issued and given under my hand and the seal of said Court at office in the City of Austin, this the 21st day of August, 1958. 0. T. MARTIN, JR. Clerk of the District Courts, Travis County, Texas. By BOB BAKER, Deputy. CITATION BY PUBLICATION THE STATE OF TEXAS TO Shannon Bradford Defendant, in the hereinafter styled and numbered cause: You are hereby commanded to appear before the 126th District Court of Travis County, Texas, to be held at the courthouse of said county in the City of Austin, Travis County. Texas, at or before 10 o’clock A. M. of the first Monday after the expiration of 42 days from the date of issuance hereof; that is to say, at or before, 10 o’clock A. M. of Monday the 29th day of September, 1958, and answer the petition of plaintiff in Cause Number 107.128, in which Gladys Marie Bradford is Plaintiff and Shannon Bradford is defendant, filed in said Court of the 22 day of May, 1957, and the nature of which said suit is as follows: Being an action and prayer for judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant for decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony heretofore and now existing between said parties: Plaintiff alleges cruel treatment on the part of Defendant towards her of such nature as to render their further living together as husband wife altogether insupportable; Plaintiff further alleges that two children, born of said union, are now living with plaintiff, who is the proper person to be awarded their care, custody and control and for which she prays judgment; Plaintifr further alleges that defendant is able to contribute financially to the support of said children and for which she prays judgment of the Court; Plaintiff further prays for relief, general and special; All of which more fully appears from Plaintiff’s Original Petition on file in this office and to which reference is here made; If this citation is not served within 90 days after date of its issuance, it ishall be returned unserved. WITNESS, 0. T. MARTIN, JR., Clerk of the District Courts of Travis County, Texas. Issued and given under my hand and the seal of said Court at office in the City of Austin, this the 14th day of August, 1958. 0. T. MARTIN, JR. Clerk of the District Courts, Travis County, Texas. By GEO. W. BICKLER, Deputy. CITATION BY PUBLICATION