Google+ Back to mobile

The Horror Every Day: Police Brutality In Houston Goes Unpunished

by Published on
Darcy Muenchrath

This story is the second in a two-part investigation into lack of accountability in the Houston Police Department. Read part one, “Crimes Unpunished,” originally published in the July issue of the Observer.


Sebastian Prevot watched helplessly as three police officers advanced on his wife. Prevot was handcuffed and bleeding in the back of a cop car. Half of his left ear dangled where it had been torn from his head. The Houston Police Department doesn’t deny that its officers gave Prevot these injuries during a late-night arrest in January 2012. The only dispute is whether he earned them.

Prevot had been returning home from a night out with a friend. He was two miles from his house when he stopped just past the white line at a four-way stop sign. Two officers in a patrol car tried to pull him over, but he kept driving. Prevot says he didn’t want to pull over and continued home—“going the speed limit, stopping at every stop sign”—because he knew he was about to be detained and have his car impounded.

“My kids had to go to school in the morning,” he told me. “My wife had to go to work.”

Prevot sits across from me in a noisy McDonald’s at dusk. He’s 30, married, with three little boys. In 2009 Prevot was one semester away from getting his bachelor’s degree in marketing when his wife, Annika Lewis, was promoted at her job with AT&T, and the family moved to Houston from Lafayette, Louisiana. Now he takes care of his sons, ages 7, 5, and 4, coaches youth sports and looks for work. His left ear still bears a crosshatching of paler brown where an emergency room doctor stitched it up on January 27, 2012, the night he should have stopped.

I ask Prevot why he anticipated trouble if all he’d done was roll past the line at a stop sign. He looks at me like I’m crazy.

“Obviously, it’s three in the morning,” he says, “so they’re gonna find something. Besides, the inspection sticker on my car was bad.”

Prevot didn’t say he expected to be arrested because he is black, but racial profiling is common. In 2012, almost half the Houstonians arrested during traffic stops were African-Americans, though they make up less than a quarter of the city’s population. Houston Police Department statistics show that white drivers are more likely than black drivers to be carrying contraband, but according to HPD’s annual report on racial profiling—which concludes, “The analysis provides no evidence that officers of the Houston Police Department engage in racial profiling”—officers performed “consent searches” on black drivers in 2012 more than four times as often as on white drivers. A consent search is specifically one made without probable cause.

“When they put those lights on,” Prevot says, “I automatically knew I was going to jail.”

Prevot also kept driving because he was scared. “I mean, I saw the cops,” he says. “I’m from Louisiana, and it was two white boys in the car in a dark area. I wasn’t about to stop nowhere close to there.”

“What were you afraid of?” I ask.

“Getting beat up,” he says. “The same thing that happened.”

As Prevot drove, more police cruisers joined the slow pursuit. By the time he arrived at his house, he estimates 10 cars had him surrounded.

“When I pulled in right in front of my driveway, I got out, hands in the air,” Prevot says. “They already had guns drawn on me. Then they put those up and attacked. From there, they was just beatin’ the bricks off me.”


Sebastian Prevot
Deric Muhammad
Sebastian Prevot

What Prevot describes isn’t rare in Houston. According to citizens, community activists, a veteran Houston police officer and even the president of the local police union, the scenario of multiple officers beating an unarmed suspect happens nearly every day.

What’s rare is for the Houston Police Department to punish its officers for excessive force. An eight-month Texas Observer investigation found that during the past six years, Houston civilians reported officers for “use of force”—the department’s term for police brutality—588 times. The Internal Affairs division investigated each complaint and dismissed all but four.

More surprisingly, HPD rarely believes even its own officers when they claim to have witnessed unjustified violence against citizens. In the same period, Houston cops reported other officers for excessive force 118 times. Internal Affairs dismissed all but 11.

In total, Internal Affairs sustained just 15—or 2 percent—of the 706 police abuse complaints the past six years, according to department records the Observer obtained through public information requests.

In at least 10 of the 15 sustained complaints, the incident was videotaped. Many say—and internal documents suggest—that videotaped beatings have prompted Houston cops to aggressively prevent citizens from recording their behavior.

But beatings take time. They make noise. Witnesses can gather and start filming. Shootings, on the other hand, are fast. They’re usually over as quickly as they begin, which may be one reason why, in the past six years, not a single Houston police officer has been disciplined for shooting someone.

Between 2007 and 2012, HPD officers were involved in 550 incidents in which either a citizen or animal was injured or killed by a police officer’s bullet, according to agency records.

Internal Affairs investigated each incident and determined that every single shooting was justified.

Some of these civilians were armed. Others weren’t. Mark Ames, 23, was unarmed and fleeing when he was shot and injured. Yoanis Vera, 26, was also unarmed when he was wounded. Kenneth Releford was unarmed, but HPD says he charged at an officer while keeping one hand behind his back. Releford, 38, was killed. All of those cases are from 2012.

Another citizen killed by HPD in 2012 was a wheelchair-bound man. Brian Claunch was mentally ill and had only one arm and one leg. Claunch was shot because he allegedly threatened an officer with a ballpoint pen.

Out of 706 complaints about excessive force, HPD disciplined only 15 officers. For 550 shootings, HPD disciplined none. The message is clear: Either Houston police almost never abuse their power, or they abuse it with impunity.


Sebastian Prevot and his wife, Annika Lewis.
Jeremy Smith
Sebastian Prevot and his wife, Annika Lewis.
Prevot says after he surrendered, one officer “tackled me into my [car] door and threw me to the ground in the middle of the street. From there, all of them rushed me and started coming to beat me. Hit me with a stick, twisting my ankle in back. While the rest of them were beating me, there’s one in the back twisting my ankle the whole time. Tore tendons and everything. I still go to the doctor for that.

“One will get a lick in and another will get a lick in. It was many, many, many licks. Like, two officers tried to kick me—” his hand hovers over the table and he looks embarrassed—“in the gonads. And I’m out there yelling loud. I guess my wife finally heard me. She came outside with her camera phone. The whole time, they’re yelling, ‘Put your hands behind your back! Put your hands behind your back!’ But they’re standing on my hands. I’m trying to get them to the back like they’re telling me to, but they’re not allowing me. So meanwhile, they continue to whup the shit out of me.”


Jimmy reads the transcript of my conversation with Prevot quietly. Jimmy—not his real name—is a white man, has been an officer with the Houston Police Department for more than 10 years, and doesn’t want to disclose any more than that. He’s disturbed by what he describes as a culture of brutality and racism at HPD but says it’s not safe to criticize the department openly.

Jimmy reads as far as the beating and looks up. “Sounds about right,” he says. “Adrenaline dump, everybody’s chasing him, they all come piling after him. They tackle him, everybody gets their licks in and they put handcuffs on him. That makes sense. Whupping somebody that just ran, that’s like an everyday occurrence. Hell, I’d be surprised if they didn’t.”

I ask Jimmy if it’s plausible that cops would prevent a suspect from complying and putting his hands behind his back. “Yeah,” he says. “I don’t know that it’s normal, and I don’t even know that it’s necessarily deliberate. Could be bad communication. But it’s not exactly innocent either. Cops are starting to learn to perform for the camera. So they know that, like, maybe you can’t see all the details of exactly what’s going on in the scuffle, but if they’re yelling out things like, ‘Give me your hands,’ then it sure looks better after the fact.”

Handcuffing, Jimmy says, “may or may not bring it to a stop. Generally speaking, that’s the sort of limit, when you put the handcuffs on. But even then, it’s not…”

Jimmy trails off. Although we’ve talked many times over several months, he still occasionally seems surprised at what he is about to say. “It’s just, not everybody is necessarily done just because you’ve got the handcuffs on. People will typically stop at that point, but I have heard officers running up to a fight yelling, ‘Don’t put the handcuffs on yet!’ They want to get their licks in.”


“My wife caught all this on camera,” Prevot says. “So by that time, the guy twisting my ankle gave it a final twist.” Prevot mimes wrenching. “And he dropped my foot. The other guys kinda laid off. Then they were like, ‘Get up! Get up!’ And I told them, ‘I can’t get up!’ You know, I’m crying. So they picked me up. They got me in the cuffs now. They put me in the back of this car, and they go over to see what’s going on with my wife. In the back of this car, I could see everything that’s going on.

“Well, I’m looking at them going at my wife. She’s still got her phone. She’s in her own yard. She’s not nowhere near the streets. She’s not interfering or anything, she’s just recording what’s going on. I guess when they seen she was recording them, those three guys, they came behind her and they attacked her. One of them tried to grab the phone out of her hand. She wouldn’t let go, so they twisted her arm behind her and punched her a couple of times. They did her pretty bad. And she’s real short, real petite, like 4 [foot] 11, and at that time maybe 101 or 98 [pounds].

“They got the phone from her, cuffed her up, and put her in a car. They took the phone and took it all the way apart. She had an HTC Evo, and it’s not easy to get the memory card out of the back. They were there for about 10, 15 minutes trying to get it open. Took them a good while.”


Less than two weeks after Prevot’s arrest, the Houston Police Department distributed a memo reminding officers that “citizens have a right to photograph, record, or videotape officers while officers are doing their job. … Officers are further reminded not to initiate an investigative detention or ask for identification merely because a citizen is photographing or recording an officer.”

The memo adds, “If an officer believes a videotape or photograph may contain evidence of a crime, the officer shall consult with the District Attorney’s office to determine if a search warrant is needed to either seize the video or view the contents on the device in question.”

Jimmy says the last bit—don’t take someone’s phone without permission and a reason—is in response to a new tactic cops are using to fight citizen surveillance.

“Are you familiar with the drunk lawyer phenomenon?” Jimmy asks. “Like when you’re at the bar and your friend is giving you crazy legal advice about how to avoid DWI, and it has nothing to do with real law? Well, cops play that game, too, except it’s new ways to prevent people from recording us. Like now they’ll say, ‘Oh, that’s evidence’ and confiscate the phone and tag it into the property room for 18 months.” Jimmy says even if a phone does contain evidence of a crime, the department has equipment that can quickly copy its contents. “There’s no need to sit on it for a year and a half,” he says. “It’s purely punitive.”

But that depends on how you define “need.” The officers who arrested Prevot might have needed to take Annika’s phone to keep their jobs.

In 2011, local news station ABC-13 KTRK aired security camera footage of a dozen HPD officers punching and kicking an unarmed 15-year-old burglary suspect named Chad Holley. The video sparked outrage. National news outlets aired it and community organizers rallied around it as proof that Houston police officers abuse their power. Even the chief of police, Charles McClelland, said publicly that the video “made me sick to my stomach because it was an egregious use of force.”

Twelve officers were disciplined for the Chad Holley beating, seven of whom were fired. Three of those later got their jobs back through arbitration. (For more on HPD’s flawed discipline system, see “Crimes Unpunished,” in the Observer’s July issue.) Four of the fired officers were also indicted for misdemeanor official oppression. One was found not guilty—an all-white jury decided in May 2012 that Andrew Blomberg was not stomping on Holley’s hands but was trying to lift them with the back of his foot—one was found guilty and the other two pleaded no contest. All three received probation.

To Ray Hunt, president of the Houston Police Officers’ Union, those former cops are the real victims. “If Chad Holley had been in school and not burglarizing a house,” he told me, “those officers would still be in this department.”

I asked Hunt how often the Chad Holley scenario—one suspect, multiple officers and “a question about force”—happens.

Hunt, who was a Houston patrol officer for 18 years, replied, “That happens a lot. And I can tell you—myself, two paramedics, my old partner and another police officer were in a similar type thing with a 78-year-old woman on a scene one time. And if that had been videotaped, I can only imagine what people would have thought we were doing to this person. All’s we were trying to do was make sure that her knife was gone and she was handcuffed. … But yeah, a lot of times, when you’ve got a citizen that’s fighting with officers, it may take seven, eight, nine officers to subdue that person. The adrenaline’s going, and it can be bad.”

I asked, “Was the only difference between the Chad Holley scene and scenes that go on all the time that there just happened to be video?”

“Um, I think video is a lot,” Hunt said. Then he seemed to hear himself. “Let me clarify something. I would not say that you’ve got scenes going on all the time that you’ve got persons who are kicking or hitting suspects. I will say you’ve got situations a lot of times out there where you’ve got six or seven officers trying to handcuff a suspect. … Is it ever appropriate to kick or strike a suspect? Absolutely. … Is it ever appropriate to kick or hit a suspect who’s handcuffed and not resisting? Absolutely not.”

Hunt continued, “So then the question is, on Chad Holley’s situation, was he resisting or not? Is it resisting to say, ‘Put your hands behind your back’ and he has them here?” Hunt placed his hands above his head, as Holley did when he was face-down in the grass on the video. “He thinks he’s complying. The officer doesn’t think he’s complying.”

The Houston Police Department’s general orders governing use of force specify, “The circumstances justifying the initial use of force may change during the course of an event. It is the duty of all employees to constantly assess the situation and adjust the use of force accordingly.” But that’s exactly what Hunt says doesn’t happen during an event like Holley’s arrest.

“When that first person runs in,” Hunt says, “it’s very difficult for an officer to stand back and go, ‘Well, hang on, let me think of the penal code…’ You automatically assumed that that person was justified in going in whenever you go in and follow.”

Jimmy agrees. “You’ve got that groupthink going on. All it takes is for one officer to break ranks and go running up there and everybody else is like, ‘Well, I’m not gonna let him run up there by himself.’ There’s a lot of trusting each other’s judgment calls on that sort of stuff and the net result is a lot of piling on. One guy makes a bad call and everybody just goes for it.”

Hunt says this piling on isn’t just automatic—it’s obligatory. Of Holley’s arrest, Hunt said, “If anybody was standing there on the scene when you’re trying to get a felon into custody, I would question that person’s integrity to be a police officer.”

Hunt added, “I want to make sure I’m not quoted as saying we have situations all the time where we’ve got a situation exactly like Chad Holley where he’s being struck both with hands and being kicked. But I’m saying that a lot of times, you’ve got multiple officers trying to subdue a suspect.”


Video, as Ray Hunt said, is a lot. In many cases, the presence of video appears to determine whether a use-of-force complaint is sustained or dismissed.

One jail attendant, Roy Ferrer, had four complaints about use of force dismissed before cameras caught him seizing a handcuffed prisoner by the throat, forcing him to the ground, and kneeing him in the kidneys. That complaint was sustained. Ferrer received a 15-day suspension, according to department records.

Adam Anweiler received two excessive force complaints within a year of each other shortly after joining the Houston Police Department as a jailer; both were dismissed. Then a surveillance camera recorded Anweiler striking a prisoner in the groin, slamming the man’s face into the concrete, and twisting his arm until his shoulder dislocated and his arm broke. Anweiler was fired.

His supervisor, Captain Douglas Perry Jr., was also disciplined. After an employee reported Anweiler’s assault, Perry sent a letter to his superiors stating, “I have completed a thorough review of this incident that included reviewing all relevant documents and watching the video…” and “I’m confident that all Jail Policies were followed and no further actions [sic] is needed.”

Internal Affairs disagreed. When investigators asked Perry why he hadn’t reported the abuse, he claimed the lieutenant with whom he watched the video had “somehow skipped over the portions” that included the beating, according to HPD records. He was suspended seven days.

Officer Angela Horton was simply unlucky. Unaware that she was being filmed by a news helicopter, Horton sucker-punched a handcuffed teenager in the face as another officer led him away. In her official statement, Horton claimed she did not punch the teen but merely pushed his face. “Because the suspect was sweating profusely from trying to elude us,” she wrote, “…my hand slid off of his face.” Horton lost her job.

Through open records requests, the Observer obtained documentation on 11 of the 15 complaints about use of force sustained in the last six years. All but one of those incidents were recorded.

Jimmy, the HPD officer, says this isn’t a coincidence. Without video, he says, excessive force complaints go nowhere. “I’m having a hard time conceiving of any situation in which witness testimony would outweigh the testimony of officers on the scene,” he says. “You could almost have a busload of nuns come by and watch the whole thing, and Internal Affairs could still figure out a way to make it not sustained. They would say, ‘Oh, we don’t really know for sure. You know, the position they were sitting in, the distance they were away, they didn’t really see the full context of what happened.’”

Perhaps the most distressing part is not how many complaints about excessive force the Houston Police Department receives or how few it sustains, but what happens to all the ones they dismiss.

If a complaint is not sustained, it disappears. The complaint, and its investigation, can’t be reviewed by anyone outside HPD or another qualified government agency. Even with all identifying information redacted, members of the public can’t read what a complainant, witness, or officer said about an incident.

That’s because Texas’ Local Government Code allows Houston and other large cities to withhold information about a “charge of misconduct … not supported by sufficient evidence.” Because Internal Affairs decides what constitutes sufficient evidence, Jimmy says, the department has total latitude in cases that don’t involve, for example, publicly broadcast video of an incident.

With full control, Jimmy says, “If you want something to come out a particular way, you can contort the evidence to make an argument for that.”

One of the ways HPD justifies keeping all un-sustained complaints secret is by pointing to the Independent Police Oversight Board. The board comprises four panels of citizens who review every serious or criminal complaint against Houston officers and every allegation of citizen mistreatment. After an investigation is complete, HPD makes the file available to one of the four oversight board panels, which meets to discuss the case. If the panel finds something lacking in the investigation or disagrees with the conclusion, it sends the case back to Internal Affairs, which is required to issue a response.

But that’s the end of it. The Independent Police Oversight Board doesn’t review cases a second time to see if its concerns were addressed, and Internal Affairs isn’t obligated to do anything the board asks. “They’re not in the chain of command,” explains Executive Assistant Chief Michael Dirden, HPD’s liaison to the board. “It’s not a civilian review board with subpoena power and investigative power or anything like that.”

If an oversight board member feels a case is being mishandled, the board’s charter says he or she should report the case to the city’s inspector general. But the inspector general, whose office is responsible for investigating city employee misconduct, has no jurisdiction over HPD. Firefighters, yes, the mayor, yes, but Houston police are explicitly exempt. The inspector general can’t investigate alleged wrongdoing. He or she can only urge the police to do so.

“Under the City of Houston system,” Dirden says, “no one—neither the [oversight board] nor the inspector general or anybody—can tell the chief of police, ‘You know, we don’t like this and you’re going to change it.’ No one has that authority.”


Prevot with his sons.
Emily DePrang
Prevot with his sons.

From the police car, Prevot watched HPD officers release Annika. “All the guys are still out there,” he says, “all out laughing and smiling and so forth. Like it’s a big game or whatever.” After Annika went inside the house, “That’s when the guys came back to the car. They looked at me like, ‘Man, your ear’s hanging off!’ They were laughing and playing with it. My hands are cuffed. Everything was swolled up. I couldn’t feel a thing. I couldn’t even feel that. I don’t even know what’s going on, I just know blood’s everywhere. But they were playing with it, making jokes, like ‘Man, they’re gonna have to glue that back together or something!’ It was just a big fun time for them.

“So they drove off, took me straight to the jailhouse. When you’re booked at the jailhouse, there’s a doctor who checks everybody in. Doctor told them, ‘No, you can’t bring him in here. You gotta bring him to the hospital.’ So the officers said, ‘Oh man, you gotta be shittin’ me.’ And the doctor said, ‘No, you gotta take him to the hospital for that ear and everything else that’s going on.’ So they brought me to Ben Taub [General Hospital].

“These guys, they’re waiting on the physician to come and see me. We’re sitting in this room, and they came and took a picture with me. All beat up, handcuffed, ear hanging. … Like I was a freaking trophy head or something. This guy’s got his arm around my shoulder, taking a picture with me. We were waiting there for a while. They were talking noise … saying things like, ‘You were hollering like a bitch!’”


Jimmy reads this part of the Prevot interview and sighs. As a cop, he says, “you’re knee-deep in enough car wrecks, and you see enough bodies torn apart, and you’re around all this horror-show stuff enough times and, like, it just stops being so horrible after a while. You’re around a lot of people who are in horrific, awful, horrible pain and suffering, caused by other people, caused by you, caused by a lot of different stuff and…” He sighs again. “The human heart only has a certain capacity, right? You hit a limit in there somewhere, and it just shuts down. It quits working.

“I’m not going to say that’s not sick and twisted,” he adds. “But it’s a necessary response to the job. It’s a coping mechanism, especially for the guys in patrol. They’re up close and personal with the horror every day.”


In December 2012, the U.S. Department of Justice announced it would review six incidents in which Houston police officers used force against unarmed citizens. Prevot’s arrest was one; Holley’s beating was another; Angela Horton’s face-push was a third. Fourth was Anthony Childress, who says a group of officers stopped him while he was riding his bike and beat him so severely that he lost six teeth and needed 56 stitches. Childress filed an excessive force complaint that was dismissed.

In the other two cases, HPD officers killed people.

When Officer J. McGowan arrived at a reported assault in progress in July 2012, she didn’t know that Rufino Lara was the victim. The officer saw him walking away and followed him, ordering him to stop and show his hands. Witnesses say Lara, 54, turned around with his hands already in the air. McGowan says one hand was tucked into Lara’s waistband. Wherever Lara’s hands were, McGowan shot him dead. In his waistband, she found a beer.

Brian Claunch made violent threats against the officers who came to his home in September 2012 on a disturbance call. Claunch, 45, lived in a residence for disabled men with mental illness. He suffered from schizophrenia and was confined to a wheelchair because he had only one arm and one leg. Yet according to HPD, Claunch backed an able-bodied officer into a corner and jabbed at her with a shiny object. Officer Matthew Marin came to his partner’s aid and killed Claunch with one shot. The object in Claunch’s hand turned out to be a pen. HPD says the case is still under investigation, but a grand jury has already cleared Marin of any wrongdoing.

HPD records consider Brian Claunch to have been armed. The department counts his pen as a weapon. But 49 of the people Houston officers fired on during the past six years were unarmed, even by HPD standards. That’s one in five.

In most cases, the reason the department gave for officers firing on unarmed citizens was “posturing.” The news releases that accompany each HPD shooting use a specific vocabulary to justify the ones in which a suspect is unarmed. The officer “saw several suspicious males” in an area “known for narcotics activity.” The officer saw someone who “matched the description of a suspect” wanted elsewhere. The suspect “made furtive motions,” or “aggressively confronted the officer with one hand behind his back as if he was holding a weapon.” Most often, though, the suspect “appeared to place his hands down the front of his pants” or “began to make movements around his waistband” or “reached into his waistband, as if he was retrieving a weapon.” Why so many unarmed men would rummage in their pants at a moment of crisis is never addressed.

In one case, an off-duty officer saw a man walking up his driveway and suspected him a car thief. The officer says he grabbed his service weapon and ordered the man to show his hands but the man “instead began running at” him with his hands “concealed in his pockets.” The officer fired several shots. Because the suspect escaped, he must have charged the officer, hands in pockets, despite seeing the gun and hearing commands, then made a U-turn after the officer fired and dashed away.

No matter the reason an officer gives for firing, it’s always enough for Internal Affairs and the Homicide Division, which investigate every discharge of a service weapon. In the past six years, HPD officers killed citizens in 109 shooting incidents and killed animals in 225 incidents. In 112 shootings, officers wounded citizens; in another 104, they wounded animals. Of 550 shooting incidents with some kind of casualty, not one was found unjustified.


Hunt says the investigative process that finds all shootings justified is extremely thorough and fair. “When we shoot someone, [Internal Affairs] comes out, [District Attorney]’s office comes out, Homicide [Division], and our attorney comes out, and we agree to do a walk-through of the case,” Hunt says. “We oppose videotaping that walk-through and the reason is, all the facts out there show that two, three days [later], things will be recalled that the officer realizes took place that he didn’t realize that second when his adrenaline is sky-high and he just shot or killed somebody. … We don’t think it’s fair, then, for an officer who—and this routinely happens—two, three days later [to] say, ‘You know what? I forgot to tell y’all, something did happen out there. I remember this.’ … If the defense attorney shows a videotape of [the walk-through], saying ‘Well he didn’t say it here!’ you can’t convince all those jurors that people recall things later.”

But internal documents show that if a recording of an officer’s initial statement about a serious incident differs from a later statement, HPD trusts the earlier version.

Officer Paul Nguyen was off-duty when he got into a fight with a driver he thought was acting unsafely. According to HPD records, Nguyen grabbed the driver, Mr. Melchor, by the shirt, dragged him from the car and held him up by the throat. Then Nguyen calmed down and went home. Melchor called 9-1-1. Because this happened outside of HPD’s jurisdiction, a Harris County deputy constable responded.

In Nguyen’s official account, made well after the incident, he claimed that during the argument, “he saw Mr. Melchor’s hand drop to the right side of his body—which was more concealed—and led Officer Nguyen to believe Mr. Melchor was reaching for a weapon,” according to HPD’s report.

But the Harris County deputy constable who spoke to Nguyen right after the incident was wearing a body microphone. It recorded Nguyen saying he “was aware he had overreacted” and had, in his words, done a “stupid thing,” according to HPD’s report. “Further,” the records state, “Officer Nguyen did not mention or recount at any point his concern that Mr. Melchor was reaching for a weapon…”

Melchor’s excessive force complaint was one of the 15 that Internal Affairs sustained.


After the hospital, Prevot spent the night in jail. The next day, he filed an excessive force complaint against the arresting officers. Some months later, he got a letter in the mail saying his complaint had been dismissed. Prevot’s injuries were apparently a justified consequence of trying to escape. “They said I tried to run when I got out of the car,” Prevot says. “That’s ridiculous. There was no reason for me to run. My whole thing was to try to get back to that house.”

Prevot’s excessive force complaint was one of 691 the Houston Police Department dismissed in the past six years. By now, Prevot has stopped thinking that telling his story is of any use. He believed that when he filed a complaint about use of force, the officers responsible would be punished. But they weren’t. He believed that when the Justice Department said it would review his case, something might happen, but the investigation has already closed without explanation. At this point, Prevot is almost finished serving the two years’ probation he got for evading arrest. He wants to put that night behind him. But he can’t, because now his record bears a felony.

“It’s so hard,” he says. “I just had a great job with Samsung. Great job. They sent me to Dallas for training and everything. … I come back here and three days later, they email me. … They say, ‘We can’t hire you because your background check didn’t go through.’ And that killed me, you know, man? That just killed my little spirit. This happened just three weeks ago, four weeks ago. Now I’m back out there, looking for a job.”

I ask Prevot what he wants to happen. He says, “Can you get my car back? Because they took my car anyway, from in front of my house.” He hangs his head. “You know, it makes me want to cry just saying that because it defeats the whole fucking purpose. [The police] took my car, and I never got it back.”

While Internal Affairs ultimately found the officers’ behavior justified, the men themselves—if only for a moment—might know better.

Prevot says during their hours in the hospital together, the officers’ demeanor changed. “You’re looking at this guy you’ve been with all night long,” he says. “They listened to me talk. They know I’m not a bad guy. I don’t have a record. I didn’t have no weapons. … They knew the type of person that they were dealing with, versus the criminals.”

Prevot had been asking for a cigarette for hours. “By the time we was going to the jail, it was like seven, eight in the morning,” Prevot says. “The guys stopped at the Shell station on the way to the jailhouse and bought me a pack of cigarettes and a lighter. And neither one of them smoked. They were like, ‘Hey man, smoke ’em in the back of the squad car. Usually, you know, we’re not supposed to smoke in here, but we’ll let you do it. You know, whatever.’”

I ask, “Do you think they felt bad?”

“I know they did,” he says. “I mean, they didn’t act like they felt bad. But anybody would.”

Emily DePrang joined The Texas Observer in 2011 as a staff writer covering criminal justice and public health. Before that, she was nonfiction editor of the Sonora Review. Before that, she was a waitress. She's also appeared in The Atlantic,, and VICE. She holds an MFA in Nonfiction from the University of Arizona and has won some things, including the Public Service Award from the Society of Professional Journalists (2012), the National Health Journalism Fellowship from USC Annenberg (2013), and a nomination for a National Magazine Award in Reporting (2014). She still sometimes thinks about waitressing.

  • sparksnsmoke

    I hope this helps. This is horrible. Great reporting. Did the guy ever get his car back?

    • gwayne

      No,didn’t you readthe article. He got fucxed again for being black and fearful of out of control badge and gun wearing animals.

      • sparksnsmoke

        Gwayne I was asking what happened after the article was written. Of course I read it. Emily is pretty awesome I thought she might have worked to help him get his car.

        • bozewell

          Most likely the impound fees are more than the car is worth. They impound the car as evidence yet the car is really not evidence. Yes, I have seen this happen and if not stopped they just might impound your house for the same reason. By law police and witnesses need to understand if police are using excessive force than a witness can stop that excessive force by verbaliting and then possibly shooting the officer using excesssive forcde. Google and then think about that one. If things don’t change we will start to see that happening.

  • gwayne

    Another reason I regard Houston as a place to stay away from and I’m white,but I understand how power can corrupt the human and wearing a badge and gun seems to make giants right or wrong out of most of them. I tend to believe that any law enforcement officer starts out wanting to be responsible, but then when they observe and report a fellow officer who stepped over the line they very quickly discover the spotlight is on themselves and the ass holes get away. Discovering doing the right thing is never right can be a discouraging and shocking awakening for a once upon a time nice person. I for one will not allow myself to trust,associate with,befriend or call to report or ask for assistance from any lawman as long as I live because of the bad behavior I’ve observed in the past. Besides, they don’t seem to solve crimes and appear to cause more harm than good. I further believe that everyone would obey every law as if they were educated lawyers, they would become unemployed eliminating them as a factor that is destructive of society. Some pipe dream huh…

  • dechov

    A few years back, a girlfriend of mine (she is white) got her arm broken by HPD when her party got stopped by an officer as they they were trying to get a taxi. Stories like this one make you feel that in Houston you are safer with the criminals…. as they just steal your stuff without beating you.

    • Antonio Buehler

      Cops are criminals – they just don’t have to worry about being arrested by other cops.

      • david seaman

        Wrong not all cops are criminals.!

        • Kamilah

          That’s like saying not all people are bad. This conversation wouldn’t be relevant unless we are addressing the police that ARE criminal minded.

          • david seaman

            I see your one of them delusional people! Prayers.

          • Kamilah

            I’m misguided because I acknowledge that there are corrupt police?

        • Antonio Buehler

          Knowing that cops are committing crimes and not doing anything about it should make a cop a criminal.

  • Kevin Hay

    It happens everyday someplace.I’ve been serched at gunpoint more then 10 times for walking down the sidewalk in broad daylight.(I guess for having long hair).The wrong people are cops.

    • Tony BenBrahim

      I was once detained at gun point, handcuffed and placed in the back of a police car, at 4 pm in the afternoon. I was released 15 minutes later with a jaywalking ticket.

    • disqus_QElRxtkm95


  • lenomdeplume

    It is my personal policy, and one which I have recommended to my son, to minimize contact (and the probability of contact) with police. I have met my share of “Thugs with Badges”.

  • John Smith

    Great story, good work.

  • Idiotseverywhereitellya

    Are you fucking kidding me? You people are delusional. He started a police chase after breaking the law…idiots.

    • useless eater

      And they attacked his wife for what reason? But that’s not criminal in your book, i suppose.

      • BeliTsari

        She (and the children) were clearly accessories to his driving while Black… Sheesh!

    • Antonio Buehler

      Right, only cops are allowed to break the law.

  • FoxIsForRetards

    texASS = America”s Anus!

    • hippie1367

      An Anus serves a purpose which is more than can be said of TX filth.

    • agio

      Meh this type of shit happens all over the country.

  • hippie1367

    Everybody knows the pigs are bullying filth who should be jailed en mass on RICO charges.

  • Gary Denton

    If Houston wants to be a world class city it needs civilians on a police incident review board.

    • BillMillerTime

      I thought that we already had civilian review board in the form of an elected mayor and city council.

      • Antonio Buehler

        If you look how much their campaigns get funded by the police union you’ll realize what a joke that is.

        • BillMillerTime

          Please share whatever information you have about police unions funding mayoral and city council campaigns.

          • Abdul Akbar

            It’s publicly available. If you really care, and aren’t just trying to argue, you’ll find it yourself. You’ll find that when deducting and divulging information to yourself rather than asking for it second hand you are learning a lot more and with much less bias.

        • Steven Houston

          Let’s see, each of the last several Mayor’s had election campaign war chests in the millions of dollars each while the police union donated a whopping $10k as allowed. Yes, there is a joke somewhere about suggesting such a small amount can but such well funded campaigns but I don’t think it is the same joke you were making.

          • Peaceful Streets

            It’s not just the mayor, but also the city council. And there is the money that the police union donates, and then the individual donations from members on top of that. And I hope you’re not going to pretend that the thousands of votes that the police union is able to deploy is of no consideration to these politicians.

          • BillMillerTime

            When I make a statement, I can back it up with evidence. When the intellectually lazy are challenged, their inevitable come back is “do your own research!” and “learn to google!”

          • Antonio Buehler

            Willful ignorance is cute in kids. Not so much in adults. Although having a profile picture of a dinosaur in a suit does tend to give us an insight into your maturity.

            Having limits on donations amounts from a particular PAC to a candidate is about as meaningful as McCain-Feingold was on reducing the influence of Wall Street on the Presidential campaigns.

            Everyone with half a brain knows that who the Police Union supports will get not only the PAC donation, but they’ll also get a block of thousands of votes. In addition many of the piggies will donate of their own to the campaign of the pig supporting pols. Further, the recipient of the piggy endorsement will have money funneled from their rich donors to organizations that have no limit on how much they can receive and then spend on their own to promote or denigrate certain candidates.

            Seriously, just because cops are idiots doesn’t mean everyone is.


          • BillMillerTime

            (You think this discussion is about me? Seriously?)

            I’m still waiting for you to supply us one iota of information showing “how much their campaigns get funded by the police union.” Still waiting…

          • Antonio Buehler

            Oh, you’re cute. You are intentionally obtuse so that you can pretend that the pig unions have no power over the political process.

          • BillMillerTx

            I don’t know whether the police unions donated $5 or $5 million. I was hoping that someone who runs around flapping hie piehole on the subject might know….

          • Antonio Buehler

            Oh, cute. You seem to have reading comprehension issues.

          • BillMiller66

            Forgive me, I had asked you how much the police unions donate city council campaigns, and your answer was……….

            Unless I missed something.

          • BillMiller66

            Still waiting, Tony. I guess you crawled back into whatever cesspool of PC ignorance whence you came.

          • BillMillerTime

            In other words, Antonio, you don’t have a clue; you’re just flapping your pie hole.

  • jesus_loves_you

    Houston pigs…. they should be put out of their misery.

  • candide08

    I spent a week in Houston one night…

  • ray2hill

    I have been observing HPD for over 30 years, have challenged them on the street or in cop recreational raids on peaceful law abiding citizens. They lie under oath in every case. At least one unarmed citizen is killed by police guns in the jurisdiction every month and only three of those cases resulted in a state trial and the punishment if convicted is always probation and quickly becomes unsupervised. I have sued them several times and because they lie and I have been able to demonstrate that I win…

    • Antonio Buehler

      We need you in Austin, even when we prove they lie we lose.

    • Steven Houston

      For a city the size of Houston (over 2 million people, 600+ sq miles) and how many police contacts are made each year, I’m surprised there are not a great deal more problems. But your personal challenges to existing laws and city ordinances aside, if I ever need assistance, I’d be much more likely to call one of them over a convicted felon with a talk show. Just sayin’…

  • BillMillerTime

    “When they put those lights on,” Prevot says, “I automatically knew I was going to jail.” The reporter claims that “he knew he was about to be detained and have his car impounded…”

    Over an expired inspection sticker? Oh please…. I’ve been pulled over and cited for expired stickers; not once was my car impounded, not once was I arrested, and not once did I catch a beatdown from the police.

    But then again, when the police signal me to pull over, I pull over.

    “it was two white boys…”

    Excuse me, did Sebastian Prevot just refer to two grown men as “white boys”? Right away I know his attitude is wrong. Imagine interviewing one of the police officers and listening him refer to Prevot as a “black boy.” One would immediately have great insight into the disposition of the officer, right?

    Blacks who run around referring to grown white men as “white boys” are broadcasting their racial animosity.

    “In 2012, almost half the Houstonians arrested during traffic stops were African-Americans, though they make up less than a quarter of the city’s population.”

    So what? That doesn’t prove “racial profiling.” Blacks on average are more likely to break the law. They are overrepresented as criminal defendants in *every* category of crime except those crimes requiring access to large sums of cash, such as embezzling.

    • usakindatheart

      common sense: if you only arrest blacks, then they will be overrepresented as criminal defendants in “everY” category of crime except those crimes requiring access to large sums of cash, such as embezzling…
      REALLY??? you just did racial profiling, your bias and bigotry does not allow your brain to think before your mouth..

      • BillMillerTime

        I can absolutely prove my statement with statistics published by the US Department of Justice. Police and the justice system are not biased against minorities. Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery. Denouncing me as a “racist” (whatever that word means) does not change the objective facts. See

        • BillMillerTime

          8 months later………

          • Eric

            You do know that is funded by a white supremacist group, right?

          • BillMillerTime

            I know that it is merely your opinion that the New Century Foundation is something that you call “white supremacist.” They do not identify themselves as white supremacists. I know that liberals frequently prefer to engage in name calling in lieu of answering arguments and evidence. Calling someone a “white supremacist” of “racist” is like calling someone a “heretic” in medieval Europe.

            Jared Taylor is the president of the New Century Foundation. He is a race realist and white advocate. Check out his video, “Why They Call Us Names.”

            Have you even bothered to read The Color of Crime? If so, did you see how they take their crime statistics from the US Department of Justice? Can you point to a specific empirical claim made in The Color of Crime that is incorrect?

            So Eric, let me ask you: Do you think that it is acceptable for blacks to refer to grown white men as “white boys”? What does such a statement tell
            you about the mental disposition of Sebastian Prevot? Do such racially disparaging remarks tend to indicate that the speaker is a black supremacist?

          • Eric

            First of all, I have no opinion on the New Century Foundation or its founder. I have no opinion on them or their organization. I’m 100% American, so in my eyes they are free to be whatever they want, and support any cause they want.

            And of course they don’t want to be called supremacists because of the negative stigma attached to the word. So, now they are white advocates as you so call them.

            Yes, I have read The Color of Crime and sure there are crime statistics from the US Department of Justice cited in there. But to blindly point people to a clearly biased source of information is useless in this argument. Try using an unbiased source of information when constructing these arguments if you really want to make a point.

            Finally, I don’t condone the actions of either Sebastian Prevot or the arresting officers. But this is America, so if he wants to refer to them in that manner then he is free to do so and that doesn’t imply that he is a black supremacist.

            For the record, I’m a conservative Texan who loves freedom, guns, and a very small government that stays out of my business and life.

            So, no more citing biased sources. It’s pointless.

          • BillMillerTime

            You claim that The Color of Crime is “biased.” *Everybody* has a point of view; that doesn’t make someone “biased.” I notice that you failed to answer my question, so I will repeat it:
            Can you point to a specific empirical claim made in The Color of Crime that is incorrect?

            Redkettle made the empirical claim that my crime statistics “are just flat false. Whites and blacks tend to commit the same amount of crimes nationwide…” He also argued that blacks are unfairly targeted by whites.

            I responded by citing US Department of Justice crime statistics. “Bias” doesn’t have anything to do with the evidence either supporting or disproving his claim. I also showed how his empirical claims can be either supported or disproved using crime date gathered in three different ways. If reports from crime victims indicate that 13% of the armed robberies are committed by blacks (commensurate with their portion of the American population), but that blacks make up 54% of arrests for armed robbery made by police, then that discrepancy would support the hypothesis that blacks were unfairly targeted, but that is not what the evidence shows.

            His response?

            USAkindatheart stated that “if you only arrest blacks, then they will be overrepresented as criminal defendants…” Is he really claiming that only blacks are arrested? Such a statement is so silly it barely merits a refutation. Instead of offering any evidence, he merely accuses me of “racial profiling,” “bias” and “bigotry.” For what? Simply stating the facts as they are? Does he think that I am making it up? Did he bother to examine any of the DoJ documents that I cited?

            Blacks make up 13% of the population but commit about 52% of the nation’s homicides and 55% of the robberies. Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery. Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent. Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black. Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery. Blacks are 2.25 times more likely to commit officially-designated hate crimes against whites than vice versa.

            The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic.

            We’re such a nation of cowards around the subject of race that most people dare not publicly discuss these statistics although they are generally well known by cops and criminologists. At its root, political correctness is a war against noticing things.

            If the police officers in an interview with the media had referred to Prevot – or any black man – as a “black boy,” there would have been hell to pay and you know it. They might even have lost their jobs. When Prevot in fact refers to police officers (who are after all grown men) as “white boys,” he is using racially insulting language. It gives us a window into his attitude. He feels bold enough to use that kind of racially hostile language because he doesn’t expect anyone to call him out on it. Given the racial double standards inherent in the prevailing ideology of political correctness, Prevot is for the most part right in his expectation. I grew up in Houston, I went to integrated schools with guys like Prevot.

            >For the record, I’m a …

            What makes you think that I or anyone else cares what you are? If my facts are wrong of my logic is flawed, then it should be easy to point out the flaws. Instead we get temper tantrums from the perennially indignant.

          • lovelydestruction

            Wow “white boys” really hurt your feelings, huh?

          • BillMiller66

            No, there’s nothing that you or Prevot or any other silly brain-dead libtard can call me that will hurt my feelings. In fact, there’s really nothing that any non-white can call us. What can they do? Call me a “cracker”? I’m a white man from the South; of course I’m a cracker, and I’m proud to be a cracker. “Oh no, please don’t call me a cracker! Anything but that! Why, that takes me back to a time of owning land…and people.”

            Prevot’s use of the term “white boys” in reference to grown men merely indicates his own racial animosity. I’m familiar with Prevot’s type as I attended integrated school. Guys like Prevot grow up drenched in a culture of anti-white hatred. It’s also interesting that use of the term goes unremarked by the reporter for the Houston Press. In this politically correct age, a police office can be relieved of duty for referring to a non-white suspect as a “boy.”

        • Antonio Buehler

          The problem is that statistics published by the federal government actually prove that the system is biased against people of color. You can deny it all you want, but when they are arrested, prosecuted, and sentenced at disproportionate rates in terms of population AND incidence of crimes committed then your argument has no merit.

          • BillMillerTime

            You’ve lumped two very different claims into one sentence.

            >people of color are arrested, prosecuted, and sentenced at disproportionate rates in terms of population.

            Your statement is true only if by “people of color” you exclude East Asians. The data show that people of Chinese, Japanese, and Korean ancestry are arrested at rates far below their percentages of the population.

            So the data show that African-Americans and Latinos are arrested, prosecuted, and sentenced at disproportionate rates in terms of population, but as I’ve already explained in this thread that does not constitute evidence of any “bias.”

            >people of color are arrested, prosecuted, and sentenced at disproportionate rates in terms of incidence of crimes committed

            Your claim is FALSE, and I can absolutely prove it.

            The best test of police bias is to compare an in-dependent and objective count of the percentage of criminals who are black with the percentage of arrested suspects who are black. If they are about the same – if, for example, we can determine that half the robbers are black, and we find that about half the robbers the police arrest are black – it is good evidence police are not targeting blacks unfairly.

            Are you familiar with the
            National Crime Victimization Survey? Each year the government surveys about 150,000 Americans about crimes of which they had been victims. They describe the crimes in detail, including the race of the perpetrator, and whether they reported the crimes to the police. The survey sample, which is massive by polling standards, is carefully chosen to be representative of the entire US population. By comparing information about races of perpetrators with racial percentages in arrest data from the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) we can determine if the proportion of criminals the police arrest who are black is equivalent to the proportion of criminals the victims say were black.

            I’m using numbers for 2003 here as that’s what I have handy here on my desk. As it turns
            out, 55 percent of offenders in all robberies were black, 55 percent
            of robbers in robberies reported to police were black, and 54 percent
            of arrested robbers were black. These figures lend no support to the charge that police are systematically arresting innocent blacks, or at least pursue them with excessive zeal.

          • Antonio Buehler

            “Your statement is true only if by “people of color” you exclude East Asians. The data show that people of Chinese, Japanese, and Korean ancestry are arrested at rates far below their percentages of the population.”

            Yes, they are the “model minorities” and they are far less abused than blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans and Whites. Very true. What’s your point?

            “So the data show that African-Americans and Latinos are arrested, prosecuted, and sentenced at disproportionate rates in terms of population, but as I’ve already explained in this thread that does not constitute evidence of any “bias.”

            Actually it does you illiterate imp. Because layered on top of that is that they are arrested, prosecuted and sentenced at disproportionate rates not only relative to their percentage of the population, but also relative to their use of drugs or crime rate, as well as geography and economic status.

            “Your claim is FALSE, and I can absolutely prove it.”

            No you can’t, you piece of shit racist.

            “The best test of police bias is to compare an in-dependent and objective count of the percentage of criminals who are black with the percentage of arrested suspects who are black. If they are about the same – if, for example, we can determine that half the robbers are black, and we find that about half the robbers the police arrest are black – it is good evidence police are not targeting blacks unfairly.”

            It is exactly that type of analysis that would prove you wrong.

            “I’m using numbers for 2003 here as that’s what I have handy here on my desk. As it turns out, 55 percent of offenders in all robberies were black, 55 percent
            of robbers in robberies reported to police were black, and 54 percent
            of arrested robbers were black. These figures lend no support to the charge that police are systematically arresting innocent blacks, or at least pursue them with excessive zeal.”

            I love how you cherry pick the one data point that supports your claim and ignore the rest of it that doesn’t. You’re a clown.

          • BillMillerTime

            Buehler is wholly unfamiliar with the crime data, and he cannot back up his statements with facts, so he resorts to ad hominem. Why does this not surprise me?

            >Yes, they are the “model minorities” and they are far less abused than
            blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans and Whites. Very true. What’s your

            They are “abused” far less than whites if by “abused” you mean arrested and prosecuted for criminal offenses. My point is that this fact undercuts your silly narrative of a white supremacist criminal justice system out to get “people of color.”

            If you think that I am merely “cherry picking” my data, then I challenge you to sift through the crime stats gathered by the US DoJ, pick any year and pick any offense. Show us the data that supports your claim that “people of color” are “arrested, prosecuted, and sentenced at disproportionate rates in terms of incidence of crimes committed.” You wont be able to do it. Instead, you’ll come back here, stomp your feet, throw another temper tantrum, and call denounce me for being wicked.

            Want to see the figures for 2011?
            Although only 13% of the population, blacks committed:
            49.7% of all arrests for murder;
            32.9% of all forcible rapes;
            55.6% of all arrests for robbery;
            43.6% of all arrests for prostitution and commercial vice.

            The crime data show quite clearly that blacks are more likely to be both the victim and perpetrator of homicide. Denounce me as a “racist” all you want; that doesn’t change the data.
            The same crime stats also show that male commit 90% of the homicides.
            By Buehler’s “logic,” this must demonstrate police bias against males, right?

            By the way, Buehler, do you know the definition of a “racist”? That’s someone who’s winning an argument with a libtard.

          • Antonio Buehler

            Your use of the term libtard makes you the winner.

          • BillMiller66

            I remember when you heroically stood up to the Austin police, and faced down the Travis County DA in court. It was seen as David vs. Goliath, and you won the contest even though you said at the time that you didn’t feel as if you won since the crooked Austin cops and corrupt prosecutors who covered for them never faced justice. You fought the law, and you won. For a while you were the face of the grassroots effort for transparency in government and police accountability, issues which cut across ideological divides. You led by example, and inspired a new breed of activists armed with one of the post potent weapons available: small portable cameras and a streaming app. You made national headlines. People took notice.

            Now look at yourself. You make claims which you cannot backup. You criticize things you don’t know about. You call me a “racist” for accurately citing US DoJ crime statistics. You are apparently incapable of engaging in a serious intellectual exchange, preferring to personalize political differences, resort to ad hominem, and denounce me for my choice of avatar. (What does my avatar mean? Don’t be fooled by the suit and tie; he’s still a bloodthirsty killer. Think about it. Doesn’t it remind at all of the prosecutors whose asses you kicked in court?)

            And now you’ve taken to referring to police as “pigs,” which means you’ve utterly discredited yourself and lost all credibility with people whose voices matter. Now they can so easily dismiss you. (“Antonio Buehler? He’s just some angry young punk who hates cops, that’s all.”) Oh yeah, you’re still a hero to the small bank of anarcho-punks in your orbit, but I doubt that anyone serious will want to appear on a podium with you.

          • Antonio Buehler

            You seem to be confused if you think I won. I have four criminal charges, the pigs haven’t been arrested or even fired, and the only people who have spent time behind bars are victims.

            I don’t care if people like you don’t like me because I speak the truth about the pigs.

          • BillMiller66

            Eradicating the culture of corruption in the Austin PD and Travis County DA’s office requires a sea change in the region’s politics, which in turn requires a successful battle for the hearts and minds of Austin’s voters. In this regard, you have been winning the public relations fight, delivering one black eye after another. You’re a spec ops warrior with more courage in your toenail than most of us will ever have, so I’m betting that you already know that insurgents win by simply not being defeated. You’ve managed to dance around the local criminal justice system and deliver them one black eye after another. But now you’ve managed to do to yourself what the cops themselves weren’t able to do: you’ve discredited yourself by referring to the police as “pigs.”

            Police accountability is the civil rights issue of our time; it’s something that everyone – conservative, liberal, libertarian, communist, anarchist – can get behind. What I think of you or whether I like you or not has nothing to do with the issue. (I bear no malice towards you.) If I don’t like you, I guarantee you that it’s not because you speak out against police abuses. Were I your political consultant, I would give you the following advice:

            (1) Get out of your intellectual comfort zone, read more people with whom you fundamentally disagree, and weigh their arguments against yours. You might learn something, but at the very least you’ll be better equipped to articulate your position. Read criminologists such as Hans Eysenck and James Q. Wilson. And since you’re interests are race and crime, you’ll also want to read Micheal Levine’s 2005 book, Why Race Matters.

            (2) Call out the culture of corruption in law enforcement without referring to the police as “pigs.” A tiny number of anarchists will applaud you, but it interferes with your message and causes normal people to tune you out. Your critics can then discount you without ever having to address the substance of your arguments.

            (3) Resist the temptation merely to denounce and smear your critics, like calling me a “racist piece of shit” for pointing out that crime rates differ according to race. Everyone and I mean EVERYONE who is in criminology knows that there are average group differences in rates of crime. Don’t believe me? Read Prof. of Sociology William J. Wilson (Harvard, University of Chicago). What people within the field disagree on is explanations for the differential. (Insulting me doesn’t hurt my feelings as you are incapable of hurting my feelings, so personally I don’t care.)

          • BillMiller66

            Read also The State vs. the People: The Rise of the American Police State
            by Claire Wolfe and Aaron Zelman (2000). It’s not just “people of color” who are being run over by Leviathan.

    • Guest

      Erm also, your stats are just flat false. Whites and blacks tend to commit the same amount of crimes nationwide (except where whites beat blacks on have more serial killers and recession-causing criminals in their ranks) although blacks get caught (because police patrol minority neighbourhoods more than white neighbourhoods) and arrested more than whites. I grew up white and upper middle class, in a community where loads of rich white kids regularly sold and took illicit drugs, threw huge parties, played with guns, etc…but outside of the DUI car wrecks, or the occasional suicide, cops never got up in our business, we were never arrested cause there were just fewer police patrolling our rich-ass gated communities. Why? Cause police work to protect our property, our interests against the interests of the poor folk down in the cities.

    • redkettle

      Erm also, your stats are just flat false. Whites and blacks tend to commit the same amount of crimes nationwide (except where whites beat blacks on having more serial killers and recession-causing criminals in their ranks) although blacks get caught (because police patrol minority neighbourhoods more than white neighbourhoods) and arrested more than whites. I grew up white and upper middle class, in a community where loads of rich white kids regularly sold and took illicit drugs, threw huge illegal parties, played with guns illegally, etc…but outside of the DUI car wrecks, or the occasional suicide, cops never got too much up in our business, never kicked the shit out of us, and we were never arrested partly cause there were just fewer police patrolling our rich-ass gated communities, and also, cause police work to protect our property, our interests against the interests of the poor folk down in the cities.

      • BillMillerTime

        My statistics come from the Bureau of Justice Statistics, a bunch of number-crunching nerds inside the US Department of Justice.
        Fact: The offending rate for blacks (34.4 per 100,000) was almost 8 times higher than the rate for whites (4.5 per 100,000).

        Many people believe blacks are arrested so often because police target them unfairly. This claim can be tested, and the numbers show that it simply is not true, your anecdotes notwithstanding. By comparing information about races of perpetrators gathered from the National Crime Victimization Survey with with racial percentages in arrest data from the Uniform Crime Reports one can determine if the proportion of criminals the police arrest who are black is equivalent to the proportion of criminals the victims say were black. As it turns out, 55 percent of offenders in all robberies were black, 55.4 percent of robbers in robberies reported to police were black, and 54.1 percent of arrested robbers were black.

        When I observe that 90% of the homicides are committed by men, no one jumps up and accuses me of being a horrible, wicked sexist, or claims that it means that the system is unfairly targeting men. But when I observe that the crime data likewise show that 52% of homicides are committed by blacks, it all changes. I get accused of being hateful hater who hates, or I hear the accusation that the criminal justice system (including the jurisdictions where the cops, prosecutors, judges and juries are overwhelmingly black) is just determined to keep the brothers down.

        “whites beat blacks on having more serial killers”

        That’s a myth. According to the FBI, “the racial diversification of serial killers generally mirrors that of the overall U.S. population.”
        Sadly, the FBI didn’t publish the actual numbers in their report. Other sources indicate that if anything blacks are more likely to be serial killers.

        The 2013 Radford/FGCU Serial Killer Database annual statistics show, for the decades 1900–2010, that the percentage of black serial killers is 40.7%. Remember that blacks make up only 13% of the population.

  • usakindatheart

    WOW…. is all I can say after reading that….

  • usakindatheart

    don’t go any where in houston with out a good phone recorder, and don’t let it be so noticeable when you are recording!

  • usakindatheart

    why would they take his CAR????? that does not make sense at all.. they could of searched it there in that yard, or search then put in impound so the family could get it out. THATS STEALING!

  • usakindatheart

    A known fact is the police auction sales. THE COPS GET FIRST SILENT BIDS, and then the public, they are all hush hush.. and guess who gets the stuff the cops steal from houston citizens? THE COPS OF COURSE

  • Antonio Buehler

    The police in this country are out of control. When will people finally begin to reject the fairy tale notion that cops are heroes who protect and serve, and instead of celebrating them start to ostracize them? We have to come together and promote a message of peace.

  • geral sosbee

    The truth about the emerging & deadly police state as directed by fbi:
    Summary of fbi crimes against me:

    Texas AG and UT cover-up police crimes :

    Consequences of USA’s corrupt & cowardly culture:

    fbi recruits federal, state and local police thugs to harass:

  • geral sosbee

    See my recent reports on fbi retaliation against me for reporting crimes by fbi, Texas AG, UT police, UT civilian leaders,, as evidenced by renewed vandalism on my car causing thousands of dollars in damages. The gaslighting technique is also used by the fbi to warn me against future updates online. DEW assaults on me also increase to a high level of intensity.

  • Christian Melonakos

    It doesn’t matter where you go, cops are all the same.

    Another story of police brutality:

  • bry

    I was maced and attacked in my own house by a Harris county cop because I told him to get the f out of my house. I moved soon after out of the USA to get away from these psycho bullies.

  • Enrique Munoz

    Houston’s mayor should be looking at this instead of prosecuting pastors or priests who express the word of God!

  • Johnathan Johnson

    Protesting, looting, and burning property in honor of a violent thief who attacked the police: WHO ARE THE REAL TURKEYS’ THIS THANKSGIVING!!!!

  • The Level

    I’m a high school student who is fed up with the corruption, I made these t-shirts to try to bring some change. Check it out if you want, it’s a start.

  • Dee the Producer

    This week The Ignorance Equation talks Police Abuse, Corruption and Violence with special guest Ed Opperman, Mike Bushman, Cecily McMillan and Jeff Crow. So tune in this Sunday for all the Police Brutality we can Pepper Spray into your Tragically Unarmed Ear Holes. Listen in Sunday at 1pm

  • Atlee

    Will BenMiller66 and Antonio buehler stop fighting