Google+ Back to mobile

Ed Commish Defends Arizona Charter School’s Expansion to Dallas

by Published on
Texas Education Commissioner Michael Williams speaks to the Texas Association of School Administrators.
Patrick Michels
Education Commissioner Michael Williams

For 17 years, new charter schools hoping to open in Texas needed a simple majority vote from the State Board of Education—until last year, when a major reform law handed most of the board’s charter authority to the education commissioner. Board members were left with one important power: They could veto the commissioner’s picks.

The board used its power once last year, putting the kibosh on an Arizona-based charter chain’s application to open in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. But late last month, board members were startled to learn that Education Commissioner Michael Williams had, by waiving a few state rules, given the school permission to open in North Texas anyway. His move has been especially contentious because of the school in question: Arizona-based Great Hearts Academies, a chain with deep roots in Arizona’s conservative political world, and former Rick Perry chief of staff Ray Sullivan for a lobbyist here in Texas.

This morning, board members grilled Williams about his decision and whether they should expect him to go over their heads like this in the future.

As Dallas Democrat Mavis Knight put it to Williams: “When is a veto not a veto?”

David Bradley, a Beaumont Republican who supported the school last year, told Williams that his decision to go around the veto, at the very least, suggested something wrong with the new system. “It’s ugly and it’s not working well,” Bradley said.

Williams had a neat deflection. “Mr. Bradley, I’d like to say, I did not override your veto. … The commissioner has authority in this area that is broader, that is deeper than you do. I found another avenue to do what I thought was in the best interests of children.”

He added that his call was based on satisfying another aspect of the new law, a mandate to encourage well-established, high-performing charters around the country to open campuses in Texas. “We want to extend the [message] that the doors of Texas are open,” Williams said. More than a year after the law passed, the Texas Education Agency hasn’t produced rules defining what makes an out-of-state charter “high performing,” but Williams said TEA would release a proposal this Friday.

Williams also said his decision wouldn’t set a precedent. “This was a one-time deal and it will never happen again,” he told the board. Great Hearts, he explained, already had a charter to open schools in San Antonio, and under the new law, which went into effect on Sept. 1, the board has no authority over charter expansions. For Great Hearts to expand, Williams waived a requirement that schools be open for four years before adding new campuses.

But Williams’ decision has been so contentious not only because of the procedural issues, but because education leaders question whether Great Hearts—a chain of 19 schools in the Phoenix area (as of this fall), all but one of them in the suburbs outside the city—can replicate its program for Texas students.

Great Hearts advertises SAT scores hundreds of points above the national average, glowing college attendance rates and an “A” rating from the state for most of its schools. Williams told the board this morning that Great Hearts’ track record suggested they clearly fit the bill for a “high performing” network. But critics—like those who rallied to keep the chain from expanding into Nashville—say Great Hearts gets those results because its student body reflects the white, affluent neighborhoods where it opens. None of Great Hearts Arizona’s 7,617 students are classified as “English language learners,” according to the Arizona Department of Education, and just two of its schools have any students on free or reduced lunches—a common shorthand measure of student poverty.

Roberto Gutierrez, who leads Great Hearts’ nationwide growth efforts, said in a statement that they’re committed to serving a diverse student body in Texas. “Our first campus in central San Antonio is in a neighborhood that is more than 61% Hispanic/Latino,” Gutierrez wrote. Great Hearts’ school in that city is set to open this fall on two campuses in the Monte Vista neighborhood near Trinity University. “The Dallas and Irving neighborhoods we seek to serve are also diverse, urban communities full of parents and students who support these new public school offerings for excellence.” They’re still looking for a campus in Old East Dallas, Oak Cliff or downtown Dallas.

Speaking to the board this morning, Williams allowed that in Arizona, “the bulk of [Great Hearts’ students] are white and probably not poor.” But he said it’s wrong to hold that against them. “There is nothing in Texas law, and nothing in the public policy of this state, that says that one cannot have a charter, or an expansion amendment, that serves kids who are not poor and who are not minority. Quite frankly, I think the latter part would be against the law. … State law doesn’t say that you can only have charters for brown, poor and black kids.”

  • Toolonggone

    Thank you for screwing things up, Michael Williams! You obviously have no idea what you are doing in this kind. You’ve already screwed Texas education for disregarding the voices of parents and school community. And you certainly don’t care how bad and awful charter chains are doing so horrible in Arizona–except for making money by stealing tons of taxpayers’ dollars for years.

    • Fr Dave Lewis

      Well, I’m glad Williams did what he did. Why? Because I want to send my kids to this school. I’m planning to drive them 30 minutes each way to do it. No, it’s nowhere near my neighborhood. I would never be able to afford an education like this otherwise, and I’m excited the government has decided to let us try using our tax dollars in a creative and proven way. How do people know the model can’t succeed in Texas? What are they afraid of? Let’s find out. I’m very happy to let my kids be test subjects.

      • Toolonggone

        Let me tell you one thing. Arizona charters are nothing more than a joke. It’s just as awful as vouchers and online/virtual charters in OH or elsewhere. It’s rubbing salt into the wounds.

        • New Texan

          Hello, I’m sincerely interested in the truth about Charter schools. I have friends in Texas who are aggressively trying to get their kids into the new charter school in San Antonio. I have always had the impression that charter schools are a scam. My kids have always attended a private catholic school and the curriculum has always been advanced. My children have been challenged and well educated. An education we’ve paid handsomely for. When I see the work their public school friends do, the difference in curriculum is incredible. Public schools “teach to the standardized tests rather than actually teach I believe. My husband does assessments on public schools and it seems all about federal funding. Aren’t chapter schools essentially public schools that need to follow that same philosophy of public schools, but without the advantage of extracurricular activities? Also, I believe people have the view that charter schools have a certain prestige and cache (but don’t carry the cost so that’s why they are becoming popular). Am I correct in this assessment or is their something I am missing? Thank you.

          • Toolonggone

            Hello, New Texan. Thank you for asking. Theoretically, charters are supposed to function in collaboration with public schools to help students and teachers since its
            original idea came out in the late 1980s and re-incorporated into federal mandate of NCLB in 2001. Unfortunately, what is happening around the nation now is an all-out assault on public education by corporate reformers and state governors/DOEs for sweeping privatization and ineffectual standardized testing. With very few exceptions, many charters are for-profit, funded by billionaires and hedge-fund managers who have little or no educational qualifications teaching experience whatsoever. They select students based on lottery, which means, very few or no students with special needs (ELLs and disabilities). They have a very high attrition rate, high turnout of teachers, are immune to accountability on school management, dismal academic performance, double-dipping tax status (claiming public for using taxpayers
            money and private for corporate tax exemption), etc. Stanford University report
            shows that only 17% of charters schools nationwide are better than public schools:
            half of those are not much different, and one third of those are worse than public schools.

            Texas is in the lower bracket (late 30th out of 50 states) in national education. It is virtually unchanged since NCLB, or getting even worse
            in terms of a growing poverty and budget cut for school funding. Texas state legislators
            are planning to dismantle public education, contrary to their mantra of conservative values. San Antonio is one of the cities in which a mayor is promoting privatization of education which makes no promise for student successful learning experience. I suggest your friend do what she thinks is better for
            educational interest of her kids. And do not fall into the myth of choice advocated by charters, vouchers, or any unknown corporate-funded programs.

  • SraVigi

    Texas, you’ve got a 15-member elected BOE whose veto can be overridden by the Ed Commissioner. Is that democracy?

  • Chris Kinman

    I too look forward to the expansion of charter schools in North Texas. I am glad that Mr. Williams was able to allow Great Hearts to expand their already approved Texas Charter license. The article states that they are a proven successful charter school group. Regardless of the makeup of the school, they have been proven to be successful. Also, he did not overturn the board’s ruling, they should not have been up for a vote to begin with. Great Hearts has already been approved to open Charter schools in Texas. He only allowed them to expand earlier than the current rules allowed for. By the way, if diverse, ethnic and poor is what you are looking for, there are plenty of those in every public school in Texas. Try there.