ustxtxb_obs_1987_05_15_50_00006-00000_000.pdf

A timely print job means nothing if it doesn’t make it to the post office on time. Our people do what it takes to make your deadline.’ We can do the whole job from computer mailing list production and printing to labeling and delivery. Call Futura at 442-7836. Em loyee Owned and Managed COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AUSTIN, TEXAS 1714 S. Congress 442-7836 Data Processing Typesetting Printing Mailing Pho to by Alan Pog ue only for aliens but for citizens as well ,, Detention and “isolation”of aliens in the new. Oakdale, Louisiana detention facility or in maximum security federal federal prisons. Texas Civil Liberties Union Legal Director Jim Harrington, who reviewed the agency document, said that the plan includes some disturbing provisions. Harrington described the definition of terrorists by national origin as “very alarming and similar to what happened to the Japanese in World War II” and said that he perceived a real danger in the constant invoking of national security as justification to deny bond to aliens arrested. But what is most alarming, according to Harrington, are agency plans to consistently invoke . national security to close the hearing proceedings and to only allow the judge to review the evidence in chamber. Harrington also found it interesting that the plan straightforwardly describes the isolation of the Oakdale, Louisiana detention facility as an advantage. Isolation of the Oakdale facility has been a concern of the legal community and civil libertarians because the remote location effectively removes internees from regular access to attorneys. Tony Hall, a defense attorney working with the Committee for Justice in the Los Angeles trial has also raised the issue of the INS plan. It is, he suggested, a blueprint for the conduct of the case: Hall claims that the prosecution has carefully adhered to the Alien Terrorist and Undesirables Contingency Plan. He cites the denial of Border Patrol round-up in Hidalgo, 1986 bond, the use of in camera evidence, the vigorous opposition in bond appeal hearings and the prosecution’s intention to proceed on technical violations when o ever more serious charges are no longer supportable as evidence that the Los Angeles trial is a test case. In court, INS officials have admitted that the ABCC report exists but only as a working-paper. According to Brown, they claim that it is not a contingency adopted by the agency. Evidence suggests otherwise. Terrorism is a legitimate concern of the government but there is something frightening in all of this. The only two defendants against whom changes haven’t been dropped are charged with membership in a Marxist faction of the Palestinian Liberation Organization. Yet during the course of the investigation, according to the New York Times one 22-year-old Palestinian student was taken from her home at 8:30 p.m. and interrogated for 12 hours. Her interrogation included agents burning a small Palestinian flag and being tethered by her outstretched arm to a tall metal pole for three hours. She was also denied access to a toilet despite what she described as her desperate requests. According to Hall, among the agents that detained her were members of the Los Angeles Police Department, the FBI and INS. “History shows that free people lose their freedom in increments,” Gonzalez said. And in Los Angeles, presiding judge Stephen Wilson described the section of the McCarren-Walter Act, by which aliens who advocate terrorist, anarchist, or subversive acts can be deported as “overly broad and chilling.” All of this, the ABCC secret plan, the Los Angeles prosecution, the selective application of a law, bears the imprimatur of Attorney General Ed Meese. Should the government win this case and find the Palestinians deportable, Hall insists that they will appeal. “These defendants,” he said, “have done nothing wrong. There are terrorists in this country who are killing U.S. citizens in Central America. Why isn’t the government prosecuting them?” 0