ustxtxb_obs_1962_07_13_50_00007-00000_000.pdf

WITNESS, 0. T. MARTIN, JR., Clerk of the District Courts of Travis County. Texas. Issued and given under my hand and the seal of said Court at office in the City of Austin, this the 10th day of July, 1962. 0. T. MARTIN, JR. Clerk of the District Courts, Travis County, Texas By: JOHN DICKSON, Deputy CITATION BY PUBLICATION THE STATE OF TEXAS TO: Jimmy Taylor, Defendant, in the hereinafter styled and numbered cause: You are hereby commanded to appear before the 53rd District Court of Travis County, Texas, to be held at the courthouse of said county in the City of Austin, Travis County, Texas, at or before 10 o’clock A.M. of the first Monday after the expiration of 42 days from the date of issuance hereof; that is to say, at or before, 10 o’clock A.M. of Monday the 30th day of July, 1062, and answer the first amended petition of plaintiff in Cause Number 120,619, in which A. H. Neighbors, Sr. is Plaintiff and Chula Vista Development Company, and Jimmy Taylor are defendants, filed in said Court on the 18th day of January, 1961, and the nature of which said suit is as follows: Being an action and prayer for judgement in favor of Plaintiff and against defendant’s jointly and severally, for the sum of $4,950.00, interest and costs of suit, and for foreclosure of a vendor’s lien. Plaintiff alleges that on or about May 20, 1960, Chula Vista Development Company, for good and valuable consideration assigned and transferred to Plaintiff, a , promissory note executed by Defendant Jimmy Taylor on May 2, 1960. Said transfer being made with recourse on Defendant Chula Vista Development Company, and recorded in Book 2172, page 435, Travis County Deed Records. Said note was secured by a first vendor’s lien on Lots Nos. eleven subdivision in Travis County, Texas. Said note is in the principal amount of $4,500.00, payable in monthly installments of $45.00 and provides for interest at the rate of 7% per annum from May 2, 1960, and for 10% attorneys fees in the event of default. Plaintiff alleges that demand has been made upon Defendants, but that no installment on said note has been paid, and that said note is past due and unpaid. All of which more fully appears from Plaintiff’s First Amended Petition on file in this office, and which reference is here made for all intents and purposes. If this citation is not served within 90 days after date of its issuance, it shall be returned unserved. WITNESS, 0. T. MARTIN, JR., Clerk of the District Courts of Travis County, Texas. Issued and given under my hand and the seal of said Court at office in the City of Austin, this the 12th day of June, 1962. 0. T. MARTIN, JR. Clerk of the District Courts, Travis County, Texas. By JOHN DICKSON, Deputy CITATION BY PUBLICATION THE STATE OF TEXAS To: James H. Moorman, Defendant, in the hereinafter styled and numbered cause: hereby commanded to appear before the 126th District Court of Travis County, Texas, to be held at the courthouse of said county in the City of Austin, Travis County, Texas, at or before 10 o’clock A.M. of the first Monday after the expiration of 42 days from the date of issuance hereof; that is to say, at or before, 10 o’clock A.M. of Monday the 30th day of July, 1962, and answer the petition of plaintiff in Cause Number 126,216, in which Barbara Jones Moorman is Plaintiff and James H. Moorman is defendant, filed in said Court on the 24th day of April, 1962, and the nature of which said suit is as follows: Being an action and prayer for judgement in favor of plaintiff and against defendant for decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony heretofore and now existing between said parties: Plaintiff alleges that defendant on occasions was guilty of cruel treatment toward plaintiff of such a nature as to render their further living together insupportable; and, That no children were born to plaintiff and defendant during this marriage and no community property was acquired. All of which more fully appears from plaintiff’s Original Petition on file in this office, and which reference is here made for all intents and purposes. If this citation is not served within 90 days after date of its issuance, it shall be returned unserved. WITNESS, 0. T. MARTIN, JR., Clerk of the District Courts of Travis County, Texas. Issued and given under my hand and the seal of said Court at office in the City of Austin, this the 15th day of June, 1962. 0. T. MARTIN, JR. Clerk of the District Courts, Travis County, To,cas. By JOHN DICKSON, Deputy NOTICE OF INTENTION TO INCORPORATE WITHOUT CHANGE OF NAME Notice is hereby given that Jacklyn Jewelry Co., 3C0 S. Flores St., San Antonio, Texas, will qualify as a corporation and continue to do business under the name of Jacklyn Jewelry Co. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that Otto Dukes, a sole proprietor trading as Otto Dukes Machinery Company at 600 San Pedro Avenue in the City of San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas, has incorporated said firm under the laws of the State of Texas effective with the close of business June 30, 1962. The name of said corporation being OTTO DUKES MACHINERY COMPANY OF SAN AN-TONIO, INC., which corporation has acquired all of the assets of the former proprietorship. This notice is given and published as provided in Article 1307, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas. Otto Dukes NOTICE TO CREDITORS OF ESTATE OF ANN ROBERDEAU MERIWETHER, DECEASED Notice is hereby given that original letters testamentary upon the estate of Ann Roberdeau Meriwether, deceased, were granted to Wm. Kay Miller on. April 16, 1962, by the County Court of Travis County, Texas. All persons having claims against said estate are hereby required to present the same to Wm. Kay Miller within the time drescribed by law. The post office address of Wm. Kay Miller is 1209 Capital National Bank Building, in the City of Austin, County of Travis, State of Texas. Wm. Kay Miller, Independent Executor of the Estate of Ann Roberdeau Meriwether, deceased. CITATION BY PUBLICATION THE STATE OF TEXAS TO Patricia Mitchell Clements, defendant, in the hereinafter styled and numbered cause: hereby commanded to appear before the 98th District Court of Travis County, Texas, to be held at the courthouse of said county in the City of Austin, Travis County, Texas, at or before 10 o’clock A.M. of the first Monday after the expiration of 42 days from the date of issuance hereof; that is to say, at or before 10 o’clock A.M. of Monday the 20th the first amended petition of day of August, 1962, and answer plaintiff in Cause Number 120,339, in which Olen W. Clements is plaintiff, and Patricia Mitchell Clements is defendant, filed in said Court on the 30th day of January, 1962, and the nature of which said suit is as follows: Being an action and prayer for judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant for decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony heretofore and now existing betwen said parties:’ Plaintiff alleges that Defendant, disregarding the solemnity of her mariarre vow and her obligation to treat Plaintiff with kindness and attention, has commenced a course of unkind and cruel treatment towards Plaintiff, which continued with very slight intermission, until the filing of this petition. On divers occasions, while Plaintiff lived with Defendant as aforesaid, Defendant has been guilty of excesses, cruel treatment and outrages toward Plaintiff, of such a nature as to render their further living together as husband and wife insupportable. BEANS AND PEAS Houston Jailhouse False Images Sirs: Reading a Texas liberal publication has been very interesting, especially at a time when the liberals were contesting the primaries. I think I have learned much about Texas and its politics. I feel, however, that you put too much faith in Mr. Kennedy. The President in my mind is not a true liberal, but a skillful politic-an who is quite adept at balancing off opposing forces and views so that he can be everything to everybody. One day he cuts down the steel companies and a week later he is playing up to the business interests with proposals for new tax cuts. He sends coffee to peace picketers and voices his admiration for them, and a short time later he gives the signal for renewing nuclear weapons testing, with the biggest military budget in our history. He speaks of protecting the interests of the little man and then appoints reactionaries to the Federal Power Commission and other regulatory bodies. I admire fighters for liberal and radical causes but not opportunists who seek to create false images of themselves. Harold Flincki, Box 83 B. West Harwick, Mass. Two-Party View Sirs: To appreciate the beauties of the two-party system one has to be a visiting Texan in California. Discussions with liberals out here are enough to convince me that Texas liberals should vote for Cox and make Texas a two-party state. The liberals in Californiathe Democrats. that isdon’t win every election in November, but they do control the Democratic Party, and what the most ardent California liberals refer to as “conservative Democrats” here would be big Yarborough boosters in Texas. There are conflicts galore in the California Democratic Party, but all factions are committed to liberal programs. One factor which may confuse some liberals is that our top leadership, office holders, and potential candidates for office, Don Yarborough and Senator Ralph Yarborough, MUST publicly support Connally. In fact, I wish that they would do a little bit better job of concealing their attitudes than they have in their recent statements reported in the Observer. Even when Sen. Kennedy secretly aided the re-election campaign of Republican Sen. Saltonstall of Massachusetts in the early 1950’s he PUBLICLY was on record in support of the Democratic nominee. A better example is the 1956 presidential campaign when Lyndon Johnson did his utmost to gut the Adis’ Stevenson campaign in Texas, but PUBLICLY supported the ticket. One year ago Tower was elected, and as a consequence 114,000 conservatives voted in the Republican primary. Elect Cox governor and he will pull so many conservatives into the GOP in 1964 that we can easily nominate both Yarboroughs. Elect Connally and he will continue to wield the big stick and the big money with Negro, Latin, labor, and REA leaders, and we won’t have a chance in ’64or ’72. Nancy Roberts, 234 Bannister, San Francisco. ‘Vagrant Prowlers’ Sirs: I was alternately puzzled nd amused by Mr. Copeland testify, as an indignant Democrat, that John Connally was an evil demon, an agent of Lyndon Johnson, disloyal to true Democrats, backed by giant corporations, investment firms, and bankers. Therefore, fumes Mr. Copeland, in order to save the Democratic Party from this odious combine, we must elect Jack Cox governor. From a Republican governor will come, hallelujahs Mr. Copeland. a great new day for Democrats, \(scourged of Connally, Johnson and, presumably, the President since he seems There are Copelands all over Texas, particularly in Harris County. They have a curious reasoning, springing from Lord knows what source of magic, in which they insist that they alone have the divine prescience to catalogue true Democrats. Stripped of all ornaments they say: If my boy wins, he’s a true Democrat and all Democrats should support him. If my boy loses, the other man is a traitor, an agent of destruction, and the party should vote Republican to save ourselves. In 1952 and 1956, anyone who supported Eisenhower in the role of a hyphenated-Democrat was a cornpone Benedict Arnold deserving the plague. Now, according to Mr. Copeland, anyone who votes Republican is an avenging angel armed with party salvation. John Connally’s credentials as a Democrat are far more valid than Mr. Copeland’s. Connally has never deserted the party. He’s never even gone “fishing,” that damply limp euphemism which spells a childish pique, no matter what language you use. In point of fact, those who would wear the party like a toga LEGALS CITATION BY PUBLICATION THE STATE OF TEXAS TO S. C. Bs rczewski, Defendant, in the hereinafter styled and numbered cause: hereby commanded to appear before the 98th District Court of Travis County, Texas, to be held at the courthouse of said county in the City of Austin, Travis County, Texas, at or before 10 o’clock A.M. of the first Monday after the expiration of 42 days from the date of issuance hereof; that is to say, at or before, 10 o’clock A.M. of Monday the 27th day of August, 1962, and answer the FIRST AMENDED petition of plaintiff in Cause Number 123,624, in which S. W. Barczewski is Plaintiff and S. C. Barczewski is defendant, filed in said Court on the 12th day of March, 1962, and the nature of which said suit is as follows: Being an action and prayer for judgement in favor of plaintiff and against defendant for decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony heretofore and now existing between said parties: Plaintiff alleges that plaintiff and defendant lived together as husband and wife in comparative peace and domestic tranquility for a relatively short period of time, but the defendant then commenced a studied and deliberate course of conduct toward plaintiff, without any just cause or provocation on the part of plaintiff, which constituted both mental and physical cruelty toward plaintiff. On or about August 10, 1961, defendant left the home of plaintiff and defendant, without any just cause or excuse, Ind since such time plaintiff and lefendant have not lived together or cohabited as husband and ,vife. Because of such cruel treatrent, outrages, and excesses on :he part of defendant toward plaintiff, their further living together as husband and wife is insupportable. Three children have been born if and during the marriage of plaintiff and defendant and plain:iff asks that the custody and zontrol of said children be award.N:1 exclusively to plaintiff. Plain:iff further requests that defendnit pay suitable monies toward :he support and maintenance of the minor children.