ustxtxb_obs_1961_06_10_50_00007-00000_000.pdf

found at the Southeast corner of the Wiley Hudson Survey bears S 60 deg. 59′ E. 273.15 ft., and S 60 deg. 24′ E. 292.65 ft.; Thence N 60 deg. 54′ W a distance of 1053.40 ft. to a fence corner post for the Southwest corner of this tract; Thence N 26 deg. 49′ E. a distance of 624.9 ft. to an iron pipe set for the Northwest corner of the said Jessen tract in the 715 ft. contour line along the margin of Lake Travis; Thence with the 715 ft. contour line with the courses and distances as follows: Ig 77 deg. :34′ E. 79.4 ft., N 85 deg. 36′ E. 175.4 ft., N 73 deg. 34′ E. 77.4 ft. to an iron pipe set 1.0 ft. Northeast of the centerline of the “H”-Frames for a corner of this tract; Thence S 34 deg. 34′ E. along a line 1.0 ft. Northeast of the centerline of the said “H”-Frames, a distance of 543.7 ft. to an iron pipe set for a corner of this tract; Thence along the North side of the said gravel road with the courses and distances as follows: N 37 deg. 31′ E. 95.5 ft., N 54 deg. 15′ E. 205.2 ft., N 74 deg. 09′ E. 209.9 ft., N 88 deg. 31′ E. 124.0 ft., S 73 deg. 18′ E. 84.1 ft., S 49 deg. 25′ E. a distance of 469.75 ft. for a corner of this tract; Thence S 64 deg. 15′ E. a distance of 254.32 ft. to an iron pipe set at corner of rock wall for a corner of this tract; Thence along the East edge of the said rock wall N 29 deg. 15′ E. a distance of 495.3 ft. to an iron pipe for a corner of this tract; Thence S 60 deg. 45′ E. a distance of 33.0 ft. to an iron pipe for a corner of this tract; Thence N 29 deg. 15′ E. a distance of 140.6 ft. to an iron pipe for a corner of this tract; Thence S 60 deg. 45′ E. a distance of 27.0 ft. to an iron pipe for a corner of this tract; Thence N 83 deg. 40′ E. a distance of 434.15 ft. to an iron pipe for an angle corner in this tract; Then& S 65 deg. 17′ E. a distance of 100.0 ft. to an iron pipe found, for an angle point in this tract; Thence with fence, S 40 deg. 34′ E. a distance of 100.0 ft. to an iron pipe found for a corner of this tract; Thence with the fence N 48 deg. 51′ E. a distance of 286.5 ft. to an iron pipe set on edge of high bluff on the 715 ft. contour line of Lake Travis for the Northeast corner of this tract; Thence along the edge of the said bluff and along the 715 ft. contour line with the courses and distances as follows: S 37 deg. 55′ E. 20.2 ft., S 40 deg. 36′ E. 512.3 ft., S 34 deg. 56′ E. 99.7 ft., $ 46 deg. 55′ E. 260.3 ft., S 41 deg. 03′ E. 216.0 ft. to an iron pipe set for a corner; Thence with the 715 ft. contour line with the courses and distances as follows: S 80 deg. 23′ W. 449.3 ft., S 71 deg. 33′ W. 318.3 ft., S 66 deg. 28′ W. 315.5 ft. S 70 deg. 00′ W. 290.7 ft., S 51 deg. 14′ W. 152.3 ft. to a concrete monument found in mouth of branch for a corner of this tract; Thence S 85 deg. 56′ W a distance of 762.70 ft. to a con-re’e right-of-way marker in the North curving line of Farm Road 620 for a corner of this tract, said curve having a radius of 1165.63 ft.; Thence with the curving North line of Farm Road 620 to the left an arc distance of 789.35 ft., the chord of which bears N 78 deg. 15′ W. 774.35 ft. to an iron pipe set at point of tangency, for an angle point in this tract; , Thence continuing with the North line of Farm Road 620 S 82 deg. 21′ W a distance of 170.95 taining 72.76 acres of land, being 11.45 acres out of the C. B. Townsend Survey, 30.89 acres out of the W. P. Moore Survey and 30.42 acres out of the Wiley Hudson Survey, Travis County, Texas. Plaintiffs allege that they are entitled to title and possession of the above described premises as the record title holders thereof, and in the alternative in each instance, under the 3, 5, 10 and 25 year statutes of limitation. The interest of the named or unknown defendants is not known to these plaintiffs. Plaintiffs further allege that on tope 6th day of January, 1961, they were in possession of said premises as tenants in common and that the Defendants unlawful entered upon and dispossessed them of such premises and withholds from them possession thereof. Plaintiff prays for relief at law or in equity to which they may be justly entitled under the law and facts and for costs of court. If this citation is not served within 90 days after date of its issuance, it shall be returned unserved. WITNESS, 0. T. MARTIN, JR., Clerk of the District Courts of Travis County, Texas. Issued and given under my hand and the seal of said Court at office in the City of Austin, this the 19th day of May, 1961. 0. T. MARTIN, JR. Clerk of the District Courts, Travis County, Texas. By 0. T. MARTIN, JR. CITATION OF PUBLICATION THE STATE OF TEXAS TO Thelma Koch, Defendant, in the hereinafter styled and numbered cause: You are hereby commanded to appear before the 53rd District Court of Travis County, Texas, to be held at the courthouse of said county in the City of Austin, Travis County, Texas, at or before 10 o’clock A. M. of the first Monday after the expiration of 42 days from the date of issuance hereof; that is to say, at or before, 10 o’clock A. M. of Monday the 10th day of July, 1961, and answer the petition of plaintiff in Cause Number 121,676, in which Harry Koch is plaintiff and Thelma Koch is defendant, filed in said Court on the 11th day of April, 1961, and the nature of which said suit is as follows: Being an action and prayer for judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against defendant for decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony heretofore and now existing between said parties; plaintiff alleges that he treated defendant with kindness and forbearance and that he did nothing to bring about defendant’s actions of leaving him in September, or August of 1943. Plaintiff alleges that he has not heard from defendant since shortly after her departure; Plaintiff alleges that no children were born of this marriage and no community property was acquired; Plaintiff prays for judgment of divorce from defendant, and for such other further relief as the Court shall deem proper to grant; All of which more fully appears from Plaintiff’s Original Petition on file in this office, and which reference is here made for all intents and purposes; If this citation is not served within 90 days after date of its issuance, it shall be returned unserved. WITNESS, 0. T. MARTIN, JR., Clerk of the District Courts of Travis County, Texas. Issued and given under my hand and the seal of said Court at office in the City of Austin, this the 24th day of May, 1961. 0. T. MARTIN, JR. Clerk of the District Courts, Travis County, Texas. By 0. T. MARTIN, JR. CITATION OF PUBLICATION THE STATE OF TEXAS TO Barbara Brasier, Defendant, in the hereinafter styled and numbered cause: You are hereby commanded to appear before the 53rd District Court of Travis County, Texas, to be held at the courthouse of said county in the City of Austin, Travis County, Texas, at or before 10 o’clock A. M. of the first Monday after the expiration of 42 days from the date of issuance hereof: that is to say, at or before, 10 o’clock A. M. of Monday the 10th day of July, 1961, and answer the petition of plaintiff in Cause Number 122,270, in which Robert Brasier is plaintiff and Barbara Brasier is defendant, filed in said Court on the 24th day of May. 1961, and the nature of which said suit is as follows: Being an action and prayer for judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant for decree or divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony heretofore and now existing between said parties: plaintiff. alleges that defendant began a course of unkind, harsh and tvrannieal conduct toward plaintiff, and that plaintiff did nothing to bring about this conduct: plaintiff alleges that defendant was guilty of excesses, cruel treatment and outrages toward plaintiff of styli a nature as to render their further living together insupportable: plaintiff alleges that no children were born of this marriage. and none adopted; plaintiff further allefres that no community property was acquired; plaintiff prays for judgment of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant. and for such other and further relief, in law and in equity, general and special; All of which more fully appears from Plaintiff’s Original Petition on file in this office, and which reference is here made for all intents and purposes; If this citation is not served within 90 days after date of its issuance, it shall be returned unserved. WITNESS, 0. T. MARTIN. JR . Clerk of the District Courts of Travis County, Texas. Issued and given under my hand and the seal of said Court at of firP in the City of Austin, this the 25th day of May, 1961. 0. T. MARTIN, JR. Clerk of the District Courts, Travis County, Texas. By 0. T. MARTIN, JR. CITATION BY PUBLICATION THE STATE OF TEXAS TO Edward James Brown Defendant, in the hereinafter styled and numbered cause: You are hereby commanded to appear before the 98th District Court of Travis County, Texas, to be held at the conr’are ,usAatsaid county in the City Austin, Travis County, Texas, at or before 10 o’clock A. M. of the first Monday after the expiration of 42 days from the date of issuance hereof; that is to say, at or before 10 o’clock A. M. of Monday the 17th day of July, 1961, and answer the petition of plaintiff in Cause Number 122,360, in which Marmeen Anne Brown is Plaintiff and Edward James Brown is defendant, filed in said Court on the 31st day of ‘May, 1961, and the nature of which said suit is as follows: Being an action and prayer for judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant for decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony heretofore and now existing between said parties; plaintiff alleges that she married defendant in Nuevo Laredo, Mexico, and that immediately thereafter defendant commenced a course of cruel treatment; plaintiff alleges that defendant was guilty of excesses, cruel treatment and outrages toward plaintiff of such a nature as to render their further living together insupportable; Plaintiff alleges that she is expecting a child in October, 1961, and that she has not seen or communicated with defendant since April, 1961; plaintiff alleges that she would be the fit person to have custody of the unborn child; Plaintiff further alleges that her surname was Dinsmore, and that she has a child bearing such name, and plaintiff asks the court to restore her surname, Dinsmore to her; Plaintiff prays for judgment of divorce from defendant, that plaintiff be awarded the exclusive care, custody and education of said unborn child when it is born, that her former surname, Dinsmore. be restored to her, and further and other relief as the Court shall deem proper to grant. either at law or in equity, with costs of suit; All of which more fully appears from Plaintiff’s Original Petition on file in this office, and which reference is here made for all intents and purposes; If this citation is not served within 90 days after date of its issuance, it shall be returned unserved. WITNESS, 0. T. MARTIN, Jr… Clerk of the District Courts of Travis County, Texas. Issued and given under my hand and the seal of said Court at office in the City of Austin, this the 31st day of May, 1961. 0. T. MARTIN, JR. Clerk of the District Courts, Travis County, Texas. By A. E. JONES Deputy. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that LAWRENCE D. SIEGLER d-h-a ACCURATE OF TEXAS BOX AND FINISHING COMPANY, intends to form a corporation to carry on such business under the name of ACCURATE OF TEXAS BOX AND FINISHING CORPOR-ATION, at 1213 Peters Street, Dallas, Texas. EXECUTED this the 1st day of May, 1961. LAWRENCE D. SIEGLER Patronage Duel Resolved? Appropriations Study V Vice-President Lyndon John son and Sen. Ralph Yar borough reportedly shared, two and two, the top patronage plums disclosed this week. Nominated by Pres. Kennedy for the four U. S. district attorney posts were Woodrow Seals of Houston, Bare foot Sanders of Dallas, Wayne Justice of Athens, and Ernest Morgan of San Marcos. Seals and Justice were backed by Yar borough, Sanders and Morgan by Johnson. The vice-president and the senator are reported to have mutual vetoes, which might mean Political Intelligence further sharing when other state jobs-marshalls, judges, and the rest-are distributed. V State Senator Henry Gonzalez is the only announced candidate for the Bexar County congressional seat to be vacated by Cong. Paul Kilday, appointed this week to the Court of Military Appeals. Other possible aspirants in the special election this fall: Democrats Franklin Spears, Maury Maverick Jr., Albert Pena, Judge Jack Onion, and A. J. Ploch; and Republicans Henry Catto Jr., John Goode, John H. Wood, and Mrs. Ike Kampmann. Six influential Democratic groups are backing a move to insure party unity, on the ‘grounds that a divided Democratic field in the one-shot plurality election would bring about a Republican victory. The Committee on Political Education, the Political Assn. for Spanish-Speaking Organizations, the Democratic Women, the Bexar Co. Democrats, firemen and policemen, and the East Side were represented at a meeting last weekend and were to meet again Saturday. VI Allen Duckworth of the Dallas News, prophesying a statewide boost for Jim Wright as gubernatorial candidate, said a decision on whether the Fort Worth congressman will run will be made by August 1. “Wright’s men are pondering the strength of Jack Cox, the Freedom-in-Ac