ustxtxb_obs_1961_02_18_50_00007-00000_000.pdf

Page 7

by

repairs on the property sought to be foreclosed; Plaintiff prays for foreclosure of vendor’s lien on the above described real property, for iudgment for the balance aue oki said note in the sum of $878.90, interest, costs of suit, and attorney fees and for such other and further relief to which he may be entitled at law or in equity; All of which more fully appears from Plaintiff’s Original Petition on file in this office, and which reference is here made for all intents and purposes; If this citation is not served within 90 days after date of it issuance, it shall be returned unserved. WITNESS, 0. T. MARTIN, JR., Clerk of the District Courts of Travis County, Texas. Issued and given under my hand and the seal of said Court at office in the City of Austin, this the 24th day of January, 1961. 0. T. MARTIN, JR. Clerk of the District Courts, Travis County, Texas By A. E. JONES, Deputy CITATION BY PUBLICATION THE STATE OF TEXAS TO The Unknown Heirs of Fred Maul, Deceased, the Unknown Heirs of Mort Grumbles, Deceased, the Unknown Heirs of A. W. Roach, Deceased, ALL PERSONS CLAIMING any title or interest in Bee Caves Telephone Company, an unincorporated association with place of business in Bee Caves, Travis County, Texas, and ALL PERSONS CLAIMING any title or interest in the property, real and personal, of said Company, and ALL PERSONS CLAIMING any title or interest in land in Travis County under deed hereto given to Tom Myers, of Hays County, Texas, as Grantee, in trust for Bee Caves Telephone Company; Defendants, in the hereinafter styled and numbered cause: by commanded to appear before the 53rd District Court of Travis County, Texas, to be held at the Courthouse of said County, in the City of Austin, Travis County, Texas, at or before 10:00 o’clock A.M. of the first Monday after the expiration at 42 days from the date of issuance hereof; that is to say. at or before, 10 o’clock A.M. of Monday the 6th day of March, 1961, and answer the petition of plaintiffs in Cause Number 120,618, in which Henry Reimers; B. J. Reimers, Alfred E. Stillman, Willie A. Reimers, Horace T. Echols, Edith Reimers, Coke Hollingsworth, J. W. Myers, Fannie Grumbles, Millie Myers Reimers, Ben T. Crumley and Juel Myers, are Plaintiffs, and Tom Johnson, Will Johnson, Wiley Johnson, Will Robinson. Emmitt Cade, Buster Myers, Emory Crumley, Mada Myers Prather, E. I. Prather, Rufus Johnson, George Turney, E. A. Brown, W. E. Grumbles, W. A. Brown, S. W. Glass, J. W. Rice, E. L. Glass, Ewell Crumley, Arnold Romberg. Clinton W. Hampe, Dean J. Du Vali, Lyda D. Talley, L. J. Reicher, N. B. Hutto, Oscar W. Keithly, Max Schramm, G-nrge P. Shackelford, Wiley A. Heffing ton, C. C. Scott, J. R. Murrah, J. E. Murrah, J. H. Hudson, Mrs. Cecil Toungate, Leslie Toungate, Carl Elmo Lallier, Myrtle Fogle, George A. Freitag, Edwin H. Roast, Herbert C. Bohls, W. F. Millner, Walter Maul, Edwin Gage, Cleve Phillips, James Parker, Johnny Reimers, Sam Hopkins, J. F. Darter, Wesley Roach, Herman A. Myers, Fred Bonham, Melvin F. Myers, Albert E. Myers, D. C. Morgan, K. D. Willingham, Frank Toungate, Rodney Larson, and those persons first named in this writ and to whom it is directed, are Defendants, filed in said Court on the 13th day of January, 1961, and the nature of which said suit is as follows: Being an action and prayer for declaratory judgment and partition authorizing the sale of all telephone plant and properties, real and personal, of Bee Caves Telephone Company, used and useful in providing and receiving telephone service in the Bee Caves Telephone Exchange, in and around Bee Caves, Texas, and in adjacent areas in Travis, Hays and Blanco Counties, Texas, including rights of way, easements, switchboard, wiring, poles, cables, conduit, telephone instruments, records, office furniture, furnishings and other office equipment and related appurtenances, and certain rights and privileges gained through and for the operation of Bee Caves Telephone Company; and including one acre, more or less, of the Wm. P. Moore Survey No. 525, and the John Hobson Survey, in Travis County, Texas ,occupied by the place of business of Bee -Caves Telephone Company. An undivided one-twenty second interest in the Bee Caves Telephone Company is alleged to be owned by each party. or jointly owned by each group of parties, listed and numbered 1 through 22 below: 1. Henry Reimers, 2. B. J. Reimers, 3. Alfred E. Stillman, 4. Willie A. Reimers, 5. Horace T. Echols, 6. Edith Reimers, 7. Coke Hollingsworth, 8. Ben T. Crumley, 9. Tom Johnson, 10. Will Johnson, 11. Wiley Johnson, 12. Will Robinson, 13. Emmitt Cade, 14. Buster Myers, 15. Emory Crumley, 16. Wesley Roach, 17. Herman A. Myers, 18. Fred Bonham, 19. Herman A. Myers, Melvin F. Myers, Elbert E. Myers, J. W. Myers, Millie Myers Reimers, Mada Myers Prather. Juel Myers, being the heirs of T. L. Myers, Deceased, 20. The Heirs of Fred Maul, Deceased, 21. The Heirs of Mort Grumbles, Deceased, 22. The Heirs of A. W. Roach, Deceased. All parties hereto listed by name, except Edwin Gage, Cleve Phillips, James Parker, Johnn -, Reimers, Sam Hopkins and J. F. Darter, are alleged to own interests in the cash surplus of Bee Caves Telephone Company. Plaintiffs allege that Henry Reimers, as President of Bee Caves Telephone Company, pursuant to a resolution voted by the owners of said Company, executed an agreement for the sale of all above described properties, excluding supplies, tools, cash on hand and accounts receivable, to South western Bell Telephone Company, Incorporated, for $13,000.00 rash. Plaintiffs pray that said sale ‘be carried out, that Bee Caves Telephone Company be fully liquidated, and that all proceeds bedistributed to the persons entitled thereto, as their interests may appear. All of which more fully appears from Plaintiffs’ Original Petition on file in this office, to which reference is here made for all intents and purposes. If this citation is not served within 90 days after date of its issuance, it shall be returned unserved. WITNESS, 0. T. MARTIN, JR., Clerk of the District Courts of Travis County, Texas. Issued and given under my hand and the seal of said Court at office in the City of Austin, this the 20th day of January, 1961. 0. T. MARTIN, JR. Clerk of the District Courts, Travis County, Texas. By:. 0. T. MARTIN, JR. CITATION BY PUBLICATION THE STATE OF TEXAS TO Dorothy McMillen Defendant, in the hereinafter styled and numbered cause: You are hereby commanded to appear before the 126th ‘District Court of Travis County, Texas,.-to be held at the courthouse of said county in the City of Austin, Travis County, Texas, at or before 10 o’clock A. M. of the first Monday after the expiration of 42 days from the date of issuance hereof; that is to say, at or before, 10 o’clock A. M. of Monday the 27th day of March, 1961, and answer the petition of plaintiff in Cause Number 120,504, in which Gerald McMillen is Plaintiff and Dorothy McMillen is defendant, filed in said Court on the 4th day of January, 1961, and the nature of which said suit is as follows: Being an action and prayer for judgment in favor of plaintiff an& against defendant for decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony heretofore and now existing between said parties; plaintiff alleges that defendant began a course of harsh, unkind and tyrannical conduct toward plaintiff which continued until plaintiff was compelled to separate from defendant on March, 1960; plaintiff alleges that he did nothing to bring about the aforementioned treatment; Plaintiff alleges that no children were born of this marriage and that no community property w a s acquired; Plaintiff prays for judgment of divorce and for relief, general and special; All of which more fully appears from Plaintiff’s Original Petition on file in this office, and which reference is here made for all intents and purposes; If this citation is not served within 90 days after date of its issuance, it shall be returned unserved. WITNESS, 0. T. MARTIN, JR.. Clerk of the District Courts of Travis County, Texas. Issued and given under my hand and the seal of said Court at office in the City of Austin, this the 9th day of February, 1961. 0. T. MARTIN, JR. Clerk of the District Courts, Travis County, Texas. By A. E. Jones Deputy CITATION BY PUBLICATION THE STATE OF TEXAS TO Lewis Williams Defendant, in the hereinafter styled and numbered cause: You are hereby commanded to appear before the 126th District Court of Travis County, Texas, to be held at the courthouse of said county in the City of Austin, Travis County, Texas, at or before 10 o’clock A. M. of the first Monday after the expiration of 42 days from the date of issuance hereof; that is to say, at or before 10 o’clock A. M. of Monday the 27th day of March, 1961, and answer the petition of plaintiff in Cause Number 119,733, in which Elizabeth Williams is Plaintiff and Lewis Williams is defendant, filed in said Court on the 14th day of October, 1960, and the nature of which said suit is as follows: Being an action and prayer for judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against defendant for decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony heretofore and now existing between said ‘parties; Plaintiff alleges that defendant left plaintiff and they have since lived apart without cohabitation before filing this suit and plaintiff alleges that she did nothing to bring about this treatment; plaintiff alleges that there were four children as result of this marriage to-wit: Marie, Lewis, Jr., Johnny Lee and Doris Williams, ages respectively, 17, 15, 13, 11 years; plaintiff alleges that she is a fit and proper person to have custody of said minor children and asks the court for a reasonable amount of money for the Support and maintenance of said children; plaintiff prays for custody of minor children, judgment of divorce, and a reasonable amount of money from defendant for care and maintenance of minor children; no community property was acquired as result of this marriage; plaintiff further prays for other and further relief as the Court shall deem proper to grant; All of which more fully appears from Plaintiff’s Original Petition on file in this office, and which reference is here made for all intents and purposes; If this citation is not served within 90 days after date of its issuance, it shall be returned unserved. WITNESS, 0. T. MARTIN, JR., Clerk of the District Courts of Travis County, Texas. Issued and given under my hand and the seal of said Court at office in the City of Austin, this the 7th day of February, 1961. 0. T. MARTIN, JR. Clerk of the District Courts, Travis County, Texas. By A. E. Jones Deputy \(First of A HISTORY OF CAPITAL PUN-ISHMENT, by John Laurence, with a Comment on capital punishment by Clarence Darrow; Citadel Press, New York, 1960, 230 pp., illus., $5. AUSTIN Laurence’s objective history of capital punishment, long out of print, has been re-issued. Legislators and citizens of this state who are disposed to uphold the death penalty to avenge society and rid us of troublesome presences may as well make use of this occasion to inform themselves of the conservative foundations, that is, the history of their colorful institution. Beheading, compulsory suicide, and poisoning are recorded in ancient accounts from China, Egypt, and Assyria. The first death sentence known to the researchers was exacted against a criminal found guilty of magic in Egypt 1,500 years , before Christ. In England there is no record of capital punishment earlier than 450 B.C., when it was the custom to throw the condemned into a quagmire. The old Mosaic law provided for hanging and beheading; burning alive and throwing the criminal from a rock were also sanctioned. To keep the conquered in Palestine under control, the Jews poured molten lead on them, starved them in dungeons, and tore them to death with red-hot pincers. The ancient law of Moses provided for death by stoning for many offenses. A crowd formed around the condemned, each person holding a heavy stone. Through the ranks came one dressed in white, who was the first to accuse the condemned; he cast the first stone. Then the others oast their stones, and bu ried the victim under them. In the days of the Roman Republic, vestal virgin’s who violated their vows of chastity were buried alive. The Romans also executed those who published libels and insulting songs, stole crops, or made disturbances in the city at night. They were especially angered by the parricide, whom they threw into the water in a sack that also contained a dog, a cock, a viper, and an ape. The Romans probably invented crucifixion. First they scourged the victim with a whip that had small pieces of bone imbedded in it. He was forced to bear the transverse beam of his cross to the place of his execution. The cross on the ground, “he was then nailed through the hands and the insteps as being the most sensitive parts of the extremities, or else tied by cords . . . The cross was then fixed in a previously prepared socket driven into the ground, and the sufferer sometimes remained alive for two or three days . . . Myrrh and vinegar were handed to the crucified on a pole to allay their sufferings, and their limbs were broken to hasten their death.” The Romans taught the Palestinians. ABOUT THE TENTH CENTURY rl Saxon and Danish kings were maintaining order by hanging, beheading, burning, drowning, stoning, and casting from rocks. For two centuries after William the Conquerer, a theft of more than one shilling was punishable by death. With the approach of the Middle Ages, tortures become commonplace and various. Most barons owned their own drowning pitg and gallows. Burning was the THE TEXAS OBSERVER Page ‘7 Feb. 18, 1901 punishment in England for high treason for women; male traitors were hanged, drawn, and quartered. In 1283 the last native Prince of Wales was hanged, “his limbs burnt because he has profaned by assassination the solemnity of Christ’s passion,” and his quarters “dispersed through the country.” The Church could save betteroff victims, but as Laurence says”naturally did not extend its protection to heretics, who were burnt alive.” In 1222 a deacon was burned at Oxford for becoming a Jew so that he could marry a Jewess. Many who slept with Jewesses were sentenced to death for committing “an unnatural offense:” The leading brains of the Mid