ustxtxb_obs_1960_11_11_50_00007-00000_000.pdf

V BOTH LOOSE TEA and TEABAGS RYLAN DER’S CASIS SUPER MARKET 2725 Exposition Blvd. Austin 10 . Tee 00′ es kls For you …your family …your guests Over $133 Million lInnsFuora rcnece INSURANCE COMPANY P. 0. Box 8098 Houston, Texas HAROLD E. RILEY Vice-President and Director of AgenCies Margaret McLemore Porter, a feme sole, 220 E Street N.W., Miami, Oklahoma; Annie Hutchins, a feme sole, 152 E. Rosewood, San Antonio, Texas; Anna Belle Hutchins Zilker and husband, A. J. Zilker, 5615 Bayfield, Houston, Texas; Miriam Hutchins Terrell and husband, George B. Terrell, 428 W. Rosewood, San Antonio, Texas; Lillie Watkins, a feme sole, 4604 Southern, Dallas, Texas; Harold W. Peterson, 711 Maison Blanche Building, New Orleans, La.; Lillian McCutcheon McKie, a feme sole, Blanco Street, San Marcos, Texas; Margaret McKie Eiband, a feme sole, Blanco Street, San Marcos, Texas; Martha McKie Pinion, a feme sole, 2437 Southgate Blvd., Houston, Texas; Corinne McKie Smith, a feme sole, 2437 Southgate Blvd., Houston, Tex.; Leona McKie Muse and husband, McGillivray Muse, 4604 Southern, Dallas, Texas; Elizabeth Walker Smith, a feme sole, 3518 Hamilton, El Paso, Texas; Menita Smith Williams and husband, Jimmie H. Williams, 1006 W. Avenue M, Lovington, New Mexico; Howellyn Smith Collins and husband, Robert Collins, 320 Crestmont, El Paso, Texas; William Hays Mitchell, Marfa, Texas; Laura Mitchell Bailey and husband, Bishop L. Bailey, Box 86, Marfa, Tex. ; Lucille S. Mitchell, a feme sole, Marfa, Texas; Martha Lee Mitchell Selingfreund and husband, Martin Selingfreund, 879 Faculty Drive, Columbus 21, Ohio; Sue Mitchell Engelhart and husband, Larry Engelhart, 283 East 4th Ave., Hialeah, Florida; Joseph Clayton Mitchell, Box 746, Marfa, Texas; Ione Evans Mitchell, a feme sole, Marfa, Texas; Jennalee Mitchell Tidwell and husband, Courtney Tidwell, ‘724 Florida SE., Albuquerque, New Mexico; Majory Mitchell Morris and husband, Nathan Morris, 1510 Suffolk, Austin, Texas; May McKie Withers, a feme sole, 517 W. Hopkins, San Marcos, Texas; Eviotte McKie, a feme sole, 517 W. Hopkins, San Marcos, Texas; Clive McKie Farmer, a feme sole, 517 W. Hopkins, San Marcos, Texas; Eliza Green Olson and husband, V. E. Olson, 6928 Cornelia Lane, Dallas, Texas; Edwin M. Green, 6928 Cornelia Lane, Dallas, Texas; Margaret Martindale Cape and husband, John D. Cape, 251 Primers Drive, San Antonio, Texas. The following named persons, if living, and if not living, their respective unknown heirs and legal representatives, and the heirs and legal representatives of such unknown heirs: are defendants, filed in said Court on the 28th day of July, 1960, and the nature of which said suit is as follows: Being a suit for declaratory judgment construing the will of Mattie Hutchins Glover, Deceased. Testatrix died December 27, 1925. Her will appointed Plaintiff Trustee of her estate for the benefit of her two daughters for life, and provided that on the death of the survivor of her two daughters, her estate is to be distributed to her heirs. Testatrix was survived by her two daughters, Gladys Glover and Dorothy Glover Jackson. Gladys Glover married Defendant Harold W. Peterson March 22, 1931, and died intestate June 30, 1931, without children, and she was survived by Defendant Harold W. Peterson. Dorothy Glover Jackson was married to Defendant Daniel R. Spaight at the time of her death, March 28, 1959. She had no children and, by will now duly probated, left her entire estate to her surviving husband. Defendants other than Defendants, Spaight and Peterson, are surviving relatives of Testatrix. Plaintiff’s petition prays that the Court render judgment construing the will of Hattie Hutchadjudicate the respective rights of Defendants in and to the money constructively tendered into the each Defendant be restrained from instituting any action against Plaintiff for recovery of such required to settle among themselves their respective rights in and to the money constructively deposited in the registry of the Court, that Plaintiff’s final accounting be approved, and that Plaintiff be discharged from all liability in the premises except to the person or persons that the Court shall determine to be entitled to the trust fund; for attorney’s fees, costs and general relief. If this citation is not served within 90 days after date of its issuance, it shall be returned unserved. WITNESS, 0. T. MARTIN, JR., Clerk of the District Courts of Travis County, Texas. Issued and given under my hand and the seal of said Court at office in the City of Austin, this the 7th day of October, 1960. 0. T. MARTIN, JR. Clerk of the District Court, Travis County, Texas. By A. E. JONES, Deputy. CITATION BY PUBLICATION THE STATE OF TEXAS TO Chase Sherwin Winfrey Defendant, in the hereinafter styled and numbered cause: You are hereby commanded to appear before the 126th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas, to be held at the courthouse of said county in the City of Austin, Travis County, Texas, at or before 10 o’clock A. M. of the first Monday after the expiration of 42 days from the date of issuance hereof; that is to say, at or before, 10 o’clock A. M. of Monday the 5th day of December, 1960, and answer the petition of plaintiff in Cause Number 118,698, in which Mary Louise Manigault Winfrey is Plaintiff and Chase Sherwin Winfrey is defendant, filed in said court on the 21st day of July, 1960, and the nature of which said suit is as follows: Being an action and prayer for judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant for decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony heretofore and now existing between said parties. Plaintiff alleges cruel treatment on the part of defendant toward plaintiff of such a nature as to render their further living together as husband and wife altogether insupportable. Plaintiff further alleges that no children were born of said union. Plaintiff alleges that during said marriage she acquired certain shares of stock in certain corporations which stocks were recorded in the name of both plaintiff and defendant but in truth and fact the said shares were purchased with her separate property and estate and plaintiff prays the court to enter an order setting aside the said shares as her separate estate. Plaintiff furthur prays for costs of suit and relief, general and special; All of which more fully appears from plaintiff’s original petition on file in this office, and to which reference is here made. If this citation is not served within 90 days after date of its issuance, it shall be return unserved. WITNESS, 0. T. MARTIN, JR., Clerk of the District Courts of Travis County, Texas. Issued and given under my hand and the seal of said Court at office in the City of Austin, this the 18th day of October, 1960. 0. T. MARTIN, JR. Clerk of the District Courts, Travis County, Texas. By ELI GREEN, Deputy. CITATION BY PUBLICATION THE STATE OF TEXAS TO Gifton E. Smith Defendant, in the hereinafter styled and numbered cause: by commanded to appear before the 98th District Court of Travis County, Texas, to be held at the courthouse of said county in the City of Austin, Travis County, Texas, at or before 10 o’clock A. M. of the first Monday after the expiration of 42 days from the date of issuance hereof; that is to say, at or before, 10 o’clock A. M. Louisiana Still Says ‘No’ \(Tuesday in Baton Rouge, the state legislature approved a 29package segregation program giving Gov. Jimmie H. Davis authority to close Louisiana schools rather than integrate them and laying groundwork for transfer of local school authority to the state committee level, this latter stratagem intended to thwart New Orleans integration. As though to symbolize the new division of opinion in the South on the issue, however, the same day in Arkansas voters rejected a proposal to give Gov. Orval Faubus authority to close the schools rather than integrate. \(The Observer’s Louisiana correspondent explains the events leading up to the five-day session of the Louisiana legislature and the 29 bills in the story below. From Our Louisiana Correspondent BATON ROUGE, La. The 140 members of the Louisiana legislature, their secretaries, staffs, sergeants at-arms, and other lawmaking accoutrement converged here five days for what Gov. Jimmie Davis calls “an emergency session.” Their mission: to keep five Negro girls, each six years old, from establishing a beachhead in two currently all-white schools. Gov. Davis has even mentioned using the state militia. Davis himself has been ordered in a federal injunction to keep his hands off the Orleans Parish to implement the federal court’s integration order. The injunction resulted from Davis’ attempt to take personal command of the city’s schools last August. A three-judge federal Panel gave authority back to the school board, issued Davis the hands-off order, and slapped a contempt citation against Louisiana Atty. Gen. Jack Gremillion. Gremillion is still on his good behavior on a suspended sentence. But there’s no injunction against the legislature. Davis, in his call, listed four reasons for the session: legislation on education, states’ rights, the police power of the state, and “a state militia.” The reference to “state militia” was not explained. Louisiana law recognizes both the National Guard and an unorganized militia as “state militia.” Conceivably Davis could muster all males in the state who are subject to military duty but are not ‘already in the armed forces reserves or National Guard. Davis does not consider himself bound by the federal injunction. He says it was never served on him personally. The injunction, along with other federal legal papers and subpoenas, is framed under clear plastic on the floor of Davis’ outer office. THE TEXAS OBSERVER Page 7 Nov. 11, 1960 That’s where it fell when a U.S. marshal tired of a three-day game of hide-and-seek with Davis, who sneaked in through back exits to conduct the state’s affairs. The marshall poked the papers at one of Davis’ aides and said the serving was binding. The aide backed off, and the papers fluttered to the floor. Louisiana has two state agencies dedicated to bolstering the state’s racial barriers. One is the joint legislative committee on segregation, which turns out “segregation legislation” on everything from welfare doles to the sanctity of the Confederate flag. The other is the newly-created state sovereignty commission, which until recently has merely warned against “creeping federalism.” On the day of Davis’ call for the special session, some 200,000 pamphlets were mailed out by the commission and committee bearing the title: “Don’t be brainwashedWe don’t have to integrate our schools.” Some excerpts: “Dirty work is being done by a sorry lot of dupes trying to stir up racial hatred. “Do we want our youth thrown in close contact with a people of different racial origin, setting the stage for inter-racial marriage? “Resist all attempts of subversive groups to brainwash you into ‘believing that all is lost . . . that integration is inevitable.” A poll of the New Orleans legislative delegation and some city politicos uncovered a feeling of resentment against Baton Rouge’s intervention in city affairs in violation of home rule. “I think it is a shame that the Governor would call a session to deal with a predominantly New Orleans problem without consulting any Of the legislators from New Orleans, without even letting the leaders of our delegation know what he has in mind,” said Sen. Michael O’Keefe. “My constituents have overwhelmingly indicated that they LEGALS CITATION BY PUBLICATION THE STATE OF TEXAS TO the following . named persons, if living, and if not living, their respective unknown heirs and legal representatives, and the heirs and legal representatives of such unknown heirs: William Thomas Hutchins, Amelia Hutchins Glenn, Edward Hutchins, George Hutchins, Ross Hutchins, Will Hutchins, Mattie Hutchins Glover, Miss Danny McKie, Virginia Malone McKie Johnson, Stephen Woods McKie and Walter Rogers McKie, Defendants, in the hereinafter styled and numbered cause: by commanded to appear before the 126th District Court of Travis County, Texas, to be held at the courthouse of said county in the City of Austin, Travis County, Texas, at or before 10 o’clock A. M. of the first Monday after the expiration of 42 days from the date of issuance hereof; that is to say, at or before, 10 o’clock A. M. of Monday the 21st day of November, 1960, and answer the petition of plaintiff in Cause Number 118,787, in which The American National Bank of Austin is Plaintiff and Daniel R. Spaight, Tall Timbers, Maryland; Mrs. Emily W. R. Deware, a feme sole, 1665 Fernald Point Lane, Santa Barbara, California; Frances Rather Seybold and husband, William D. Seybold, 2041 Claremont Lane, Houston, Texas; Roy L. Rather, 3650 Wickersham, Houston, Texas; Mrs. Bertha Hutchins Nelson, a feme sole, 704 E. Polk Street, Phoenix, Arizona; Mrs. Evelyn Rice Hutchins and husband, Frank W. Nelson, 437 Capps Street, Marlin, Texas; Selwyn P. R. Hutchins, 1232 Herman Prof. Building, Houston, Texas; Marjorie Payne Johnson, a feme sole, Vinita, Ok