Skip to Content
Subscribe | Donate | Advertise

A Good Doc on the Good Doctor

March 10th, 2008 at 9:10 am

Anyone interested in journalism — can we get a show of hands, please? — ought to make a point of taking in Gonzo: The Life and Work of Dr. Hunter S. Thompson, the mad genius/incorrigible iconoclast who most famously offed the American Dream with the literary shotgun blast of Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas and later killed himself (in 2005) with a single bullet to the head.

(Even if journalism isn’t your thing, you should still check Gonzo out, if only to remind yourself that this most apologetic of contemporary professions once played in the big leagues of American star-culture, right alongside politics and rock and roll.)

Thompson’s full bibliography and influence are too rich to repeat here, but director Alex Gibney (Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room; The Trials of Henry Kissinger) has gained access to never-before-seen archival film of Thompson at work and at play, and it’s revelatory, though it leaves unanswered the most enduring of HST trivia questions: How could a grown man who lived in snow country (Aspen-area Colorado) spend so much of his life wearing shorts?

With the addition of a few unfortunate but brief dramatic reenactments, Gibney has assembled a reasonably full biography and a monument to Thompson’s best years that doesn’t ignore the fact that they were relatively few. Or that having stared down Hells Angels and Richard Nixon alike with his twin senses of humor and rage intact, it was ultimately an enemy as insubstantial as fame that robbed the writer of his mojo.

Remembrances by running-buddies including Rolling Stone publisher Jann Wenner, Margaritaville tycoon Jimmy Buffett, illustrator/collaborator Ralph Steadman and likable xenophobe Pat Buchanan polish the already well-worn legend. Son Juan and two wives add painful human perspective to the apparently more-or-less true mythology of an uncomfortable but irrepressible cartoon character (HST is the model for Doonesbury’s Raoul Duke, of course).

The wealth of firsthand footage is a treat for fans, of whom there was no shortage Saturday night at the Alamo Draft House for the documentary’s SXSW regional premiere. The film shows one more time during the festival, at the same venue, at 10 p.m. on Thursday night, March 13th. If you don’t want to get stuck in a folding chair in the aisle, we recommend you arrive on the early side.

Special if potentially depressing treat for political junkies, of which Thompson was emphatically one: The film’s recollection of the 1972 presidential race, in which an exceedingly Bush-like Nixon beats ascendant out-of-Vietnam-now candidate George McGovern like a bad dog in the general election, is a tart and timely reminder of just how much hope and idealism can be squandered — even in the face of a compellingly evil alternative — by a few stupid mistakes. The contemporary parallels are unavoidable. And, one can hope, imprecise.

by Brad Tyer

One Response to “A Good Doc on the Good Doctor”

  1. stephenhsmith says:

    “Once they let you get away with running around for ten years like a king hoodlum, you tend to forget now and then that about half of the people you meet live from one day to the next in a state of such fear and uncertainty, that about half the time they doubt their own sanity. These are not the kind of people who really need to get hung up on depressing political trips. They are not ready for it. Their boats are rocking so badly that all they want to do is get level long enough to think straight and avoid the next nightmare.”

    Hunter S. Thompson ‘Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail ‘72′ pg 64

    I’ve learned after thirty years of experience that this quote is so accurate, that I have printed it out and stuck it on my wall where I can see it everyday to remind me that most of the people who chance upon my writings or, heaven help ‘em, have to endure me in person, are people who lead cluttered, stormy and fragile lives, compared to mine. And they do not have the luxury of time, nor if they did, would have the desire to investigate the injustices manifesting all around them with ever greater frequency and intensity, and contemplate their greater and future significance. I do not envy them and find it most ironic that they do not envy me. shs feb2007

Leave a Reply

Commenting Policy - The Texas Observer encourages feedback and discussion, but all comments are moderated. We will try to be diligent in approving comments, but we can't guarantee they will appear immediately. Comments that are excessively offensive, profane, or off-topic will not be published. HTML tags are limited to basic formatting and hyperlinks.

Subscribe Now

Authors

Archives

Categories

Receive Observer blog posts via e-mail

Skip to Main Navigation