Floor Pass

Texas State Capitol in Austin, Tex.
Patrick Michels

The Lead

The top campaign donor in Texas, Bob Perry, passed away late Saturday night at his Nassau Bay home near Houston. The Houston Chronicle has a story about his significant impact on Texas politics. Perry, a wealthy homebuilder, gave tens of millions mostly to Republicans, and bent public policy in Texas toward his conservative worldview. He donated heavily to Governors George W. Bush and Rick Perry, as well as millions to PACs and other Republican candidates across the country. He famously bankrolled the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth campaign that damaged John Kerry’s 2004 presidential bid. In 2003, he prodded the Legislature to create his own state agency—the Texas Residential Construction Commission—that served the interests of the homebuilding industry, until public backlash forced lawmakers to abolish it.  That was the kind of influence Bob Perry had. He was 80 years old.

Meanwhile, at the Capitol, the session is speeding up with just over a month until the finale. The budget is headed to conference committee where lawmakers will iron out differences between the House and Senate versions. Rep. Jim Pitts, chair of the House Appropriations Committee, said a supplemental education spending bill is on the way.

Weekend Headlines:

1. Gov. Rick Perry proposed dedicating growth in motor-vehicle sale revenue to improving roads. This would be on top of using the rainy day fund, halting diversions from the dedicated transportation fund and utilizing low interest rates to make financing easier, as the Quorum Report writes.

2. The Senate has passed a bill to help South Texas hospitals get hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funds for indigent healthcare, the Rio Grande Guardian reports.

Line of the Day:

“They have the audacity to act as though they’re underpaid. They’re enriching themselves by having their living expenses paid for ad infinitum,” —Dave Palmer, a California based campaign finance watchdog, told the Texas Tribune about Texas legislators.

What We’re Watching Today:

1.  The Senate State Affairs Committee will hear a constitutional amendment, SJR 4, by Sen. Donna Campbell (R-New Braunfels) on religious liberty. The amendment would bar government from infringing on a person or group acting (or not acting) out of religious faith. Seems harmless, but it could impact all kinds of policy, including this.

2. The Texas Legislative Study Group will release Texas on the Brink, a report that ranks Texas compared to other states. A sampling: Texas ranks first for the highest percentage of uninsured people and 50th in the percentage of students graduating from high school. Yikes.

3. If you’re in Austin, the whole Texas Observer bunch will be talking politics at tonight’s Mid-Session Review at MonkeyWrench Books.

Texas State Capitol in Austin, Tex.
Patrick Michels

The Lead:

The big news yesterday was in the Senate, which passed a heavily amended version of Senate Education Chair Dan Patrick’s controversial charter school reform bill Thursday afternoon, with only one vote against. The bill originally would have removed a state cap on the number of state-issued charter schools, created a new education board to oversee charters, and required public-school districts to allow charters to occupy any empty facilities.

As the Observer‘s Liz Farmer reports, Sen. Royce West (D-Dallas) offered an amendment that—instead of eliminating the cap altogether—would set it at 305 by 2019 and would also impose a cap on out-of-state charter schools. Patrick accepted the change along with several other Democratic amendments. Just before the bill passed, senators applauded the “new” Dan Patrick and asked him to remember this feat of bipartisan cooperation.

Yesterday’s Headlines:

1 The Senate passed an amended version of SB 21, which mandates drug testing for some Texans seeking unemployment benefits, the Quorum Report writes. It was the second drug-testing bill the Senate passed in two days. Both were heavily amended to attract Democratic support.

2. The Texas Tribune reports that Senate Finance Committee Chair Tommy Williams (R-The Woodlands) laid out his plan to filter $6 billion from the rainy day fund into transportation and water projects and laid the groundwork for a discussion on using some of the funds for public education.

Line of the Day:

“Perhaps they do not understand the difference between ‘inconvenient’ and ‘confidential’… I cannot help but note the irony of Chair Powell’s complaints, given the sweeping demands for information demanded by some regents from [University of Texas at Austin] personnel.” —Sen. Judith Zaffirini (D-Laredo) to the Texas Tribune  about the UT regents’ refusal to turn over documents to the Legislature

What We’re Watching Today:

1. It’s Friday, and the Legislature is still in town. Well, House members are around anyway—the House’s first working Friday of 2013, a clear sign that we’ve entered the session’s final stretch. The House is meeting today at 10 a.m. A few bills are up on third and final reading, including HB 1642, the Port of Houston Authority Sunset Bill. The bill would limit terms for port authority commissioners, require the port authority to pay for a review by the Sunset Advisory Committee in the 2016-17 biennium.

2. The House Public Health Committee will meet at 9 a.m., but as of this writing no agenda has been posted yet.

Dan Patrick
State Sen. Dan Patrick (R-Houston)

The Senate passed Sen. Dan Patrick’s major charter school reform bill Thursday afternoon, in a version far different from what Patrick introduced earlier this session. A few compromises with Democratic members helped it along to broad approval on a 30-1 vote.

Senators congratulated one another before the vote and roamed the floor to pat each other on the back afterward, but the scene would have played out much differently earlier in the day, when the bill didn’t include the checks some Democrats wanted placed on charter school expansion. Patrick (R-Houston), chair of the Senate Education Committee, delayed the vote a few hours to talk behind the scenes with critics including Sen. Leticia Van de Putte (D-San Antonio) and Sen. Royce West (D-Dallas). Both West and Van de Putte had already complained they’d been left out as Patrick shaped the bill in committee.

Thursday afternoon, Patrick graciously endorsed West’s amendments to his bill, a cap on state-issued charters set at 305 by the year 2019. Patrick had originally proposed eliminating the cap altogether. His original bill also added new spending for charter school buildings, required public school districts let charters occupy their vacant buildings, and created a new board to approve and oversee charters. Patrick, one of the Legislature’s most strong-willed conservatives, compromised on all these points to see his bill through.

“Mr. President and members, I want to introduce the new Dan Patrick,” West said today. “I know that the best is yet to come in terms of the other issues that we’re working together on.”

West said the cap gives the state more control over charter quality. Democrats also pushed to ensure out-of-state charters to be subject to the cap.

Another skeptic of the original bill, Sen. Wendy Davis (D-Fort Worth), also lauded Patrick’s efforts.

“What we see, as a result of a bipartisan effort and your willingness to work across the aisle on this bill, is an excellent product,” Davis said. “It’s very, very different than it was when you first laid it out.”

Under SB 2, the Commissioner of Education will be brought into the approval process, but will leave final authority to approve charters with the State Board of Education, which handles it today. “This is going to give the commissioner the teeth he needs,” Patrick said.

After the vote, West told the Observer he voted for the bill because of those compromises, and the bill’s provision to revoke charters for schools that performed poorly in three out of five years.

“The reality is we have got to have a better system in the state of Texas with dealing with charters,” West said. “I think this is a great improvement on it.”

SB 2 could face a tough fight for approval in the House, where previous attempts at charter school expansion have died in recent sessions. If it’s approved, though, differences between the House and Senate versions will be negotiated in a conference committee of a few members. In the midst of his high praise for Patrick’s leadership, West also secured a promise that the cap on charter schools—including those from out of state—would stay in the bill.

Underneath the feel-good congratulations for Patrick’s willingness to compromise, there was still a note of caution.

“I see it as our collective bill,” Patrick reflected at one point, “as members of the education committee in the Senate.”

“I want you to remember that,” West broke in.

“I won’t forget,” Patrick said with a smile.

After a beat, West replied: “I won’t let you, either.”

The Lead:

The rainy day fund was once untouchable. Two years ago, the Legislature cut $5.4 billion from public schools rather than tap the fund, even though, as many lawmakers pointed out, it was the rainiest of days.

But when the Senate Finance Committee meets this morning, Chair Tommy Williams will lay out a plan to spend $6 billion from the rainy day fund on water and transportation projects, reports the Associated Press. The plan calls for $2.5 billion on projects from the state water plan and $3.5 billion for road projects. The spending would account for about half the available money in the rainy day fund or as it’s technically called, Economic Stabilization Fund.

No one would argue that water and road projects aren’t key needs for the state. But some Democrats might wonder if Texas should really spend $3.5 billion on roads when the Senate version of the budget increases school funding by just $1.5 billion—restoring less than a third of what was cut in 2011.

Yesterday’s Headline:

1. There were several abortion debates yesterday, including a hearing on the controversial fetal pain bill. Rep. Jodie Laubenberg’s HB 2364 would ban most abortions after 20 weeks. The Observer‘s Beth Cortez-Neavel has the details.

2. In the same hearing, the House State Affairs Committee heard Rep. Sarah Davis’ (R-Houston) bill that would remove language linking breast cancer to abortion in mandated state materials given to abortion facilities, a “link” that is not only unfounded, but which recent scientific research has actually disproven, as the Observer‘s Emily Mathis reports.

3. The controversial SB 11 passed the Senate yesterday morning. Sen. Jane Nelson’s measure is the first of seven related to drug screening and testing of welfare applicants to be heard in either chamber. It was one of the more controversial bills this session, but the watered-down version passed the Senate unanimously.

4. Rep. Rene Oliveira’s (D-Brownsville) bill, which tackles pipeline companies’ eminent domain power, was discussed in the House Business and Industry Committee on Tuesday night.

Line of the Day:

“I’ve always thought the senate was the sensible chamber. This is a huge disappointment.” Terri Burke, executive director of the ACLU of Texas, told the Houston Chronicle of Nelson’s drug testing welfare applicants bill.

What We’re Watching Today:

1. The Senate Finance Committee will debate tapping into the rainy day fund to pay for infrastructure projects.

2. The House Homeland Security and Public Safety Committee will hear a bill with this caption: “Relating to peace officers commissioned by the State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners.” Apparently vets need protecting.

Rep. Jodie Laubenberg (R-Parker)
Rep. Jodie Laubenberg (R-Parker)

After a long Wednesday considering airport security screenings and fireworks regulations, the House State Affairs Committee tried its hand at medical science, with Rep. Jodie Laubenberg’s proposal to ban abortions after 20 weeks.

Back in January, Gov. Rick Perry said a “fetal pain” bill like House Bill 2364 was one of his priorities for the session. The measure is based on the pseudoscientific argument that fetuses can feel pain 20 weeks after conception, a hot sub-debate within the fight over abortion access.

State Affairs, which also heard last session’s pre-abortion sonogram bill, is at the center of the women’s health debate again this session. Having already debated Wednesday whether abortion raises a woman’s risk of breast cancer (it doesn’t), the committee grappled with even deeper scientific questions with Laubenberg’s bill.

Laubenberg and Rep. Jessica Farrar (D-Houston) argued right off the bat about how to determine the age of the fetus. Laubenberg said that determining the age by the last menstrual period was more medically subjective that pinpointing the exact moment of sperm-hits-egg conception. Farrar disagreed. “This is quite the opposite,” she said.

Laubenberg told lawmakers she had a slew of peer-reviewed studies supporting “fetal pain” science. The pro-life group Texas Right to Life also circulated a video Wednesday featuring freshman Rep. Greg Bonnen (R-Friendswood), a neurosurgeon, to explain the “science” behind the 20-week theory.

As Rep. Farrar pointed out numerous times throughout the hearing, a 2005 study from the Journal of the American Medical Association discredits the theory. According to JAMA, “Pain perception requires conscious recognition or awareness of a noxious stimulus,” and the capacity for a fetus’s perception of pain probably doesn’t exist before 29 or 30 weeks. Another study by University College London determined fetuses do respond to painful stimuli, but not until 35 to 37 weeks, which would be close to birth.

“I will very gladly place my studies against your studies,” Laubenberg told Farrar.

Some doctors from Texas and out-of-state backed Laubenberg. “I have the deep impression that these babies … have a nervous system developed enough to responds to pain,” Galveston doctor Patrick Nunnelly said.

Laubenberg’s bill would ensure that a doctor who induces, or attempts to induce, an abortion in violation of the 20-week rule can’t to renew their medical license. The bill would prohibit releasing the identity of a woman whose abortion had come after 20 weeks without her permission—or a judge’s ruling.

The bill also mandates that a woman seeking an abortion must have the physician determine the post-fertilization age of the fetus, must get a second opinion on the age of the fetus from another physician and the physician performing the abortion should provide “the best opportunity for the unborn child to survive.”

The legislation provides an exception to this 20-week rule only if the woman is in danger of death or physical impairment if she does not get the abortion. Psychological harm to the woman is not taken into account. There is no exception if the woman is healthy except for risks if she takes the pregnancy to term, or if a medical diagnosis states that there is only a potential for the woman’s death or physical harm. There’s no exception based on the health of the fetus.

Critics of the bill testified that it’s irresponsible to ignore special cases like those, since abortions after 20 weeks often involve rare circumstances.

Whether the science behind the bill is faulty or not, ACLU Legal and Policy Director Rebecca Robertson said the bill’s provisions are unconstitutional. A report released earlier this month from the Guttmacher Institute noted that since Roe v. Wade, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that states may only restrict or ban abortions after proving the fetus could survive after birth, but that “even after fetal viability, states may not prohibit abortions ‘necessary to preserve the life or health’ of the woman.”

Laubenberg, Texas’ state chair for the American Legislative Exchange Council, noted how popular these 20-week abortion bans have been across the country lately. Ten states—Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Nebraska and Oklahoma—have already enacted 20-week abortion bans. Though Idaho’s was recently rejected by a federal judge, similar bills are working their way through other state legislatures.

The committee left the bill pending.

1 13 14 15 16 17 50