<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chertoff Challenge Denied by Supremes</title>
	<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=969</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lost in the Shuffle: under-reported US News round-up &#171; Hope2012</title>
		<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=969#comment-80854</link>
		<dc:creator>Lost in the Shuffle: under-reported US News round-up &#171; Hope2012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 15:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=969#comment-80854</guid>
		<description>[...] Supreme Court refuses to hear challenge to Homeland Security&#8217;s actions to break 37 federal law... - Texas Observer 6/23/08 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Supreme Court refuses to hear challenge to Homeland Security&#8217;s actions to break 37 federal law&#8230; - Texas Observer 6/23/08 [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stormkite</title>
		<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=969#comment-79586</link>
		<dc:creator>stormkite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 03:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=969#comment-79586</guid>
		<description>Can't understand why Matt Clark is crushed. Can't for the LIFE of me see why he'd have expected anything else from this supreme court.  Never admit error, never apologize, never explain, and always blame Clinton.  It's the Republican way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t understand why Matt Clark is crushed. Can&#8217;t for the LIFE of me see why he&#8217;d have expected anything else from this supreme court.  Never admit error, never apologize, never explain, and always blame Clinton.  It&#8217;s the Republican way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Bacon</title>
		<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=969#comment-79556</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Bacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=969#comment-79556</guid>
		<description>JA, VE VILL do what VE think is necessary to secure the borders from those pesky immigrants, JA.

VE have ZE power and you pitiful masses have MTV, JA.

VE are in charge and you'd better get used to that boot on your neck, JA.

Pay no attention to the fact that Fuehrer Bush's good buddies in Texas don't have to contend with this wall, JA, since VE VILL not be building that fence on their land, JA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JA, VE VILL do what VE think is necessary to secure the borders from those pesky immigrants, JA.</p>
<p>VE have ZE power and you pitiful masses have MTV, JA.</p>
<p>VE are in charge and you&#8217;d better get used to that boot on your neck, JA.</p>
<p>Pay no attention to the fact that Fuehrer Bush&#8217;s good buddies in Texas don&#8217;t have to contend with this wall, JA, since VE VILL not be building that fence on their land, JA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arty Face</title>
		<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=969#comment-79553</link>
		<dc:creator>Arty Face</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=969#comment-79553</guid>
		<description>A huge wall should be built to keep all the drug runners, terrorist, criminals, kidnappers, gang members inside the US where they belong. 

Really what kind of democracy allows an appointed official to just wave whatever laws he wants with no recourse? In my dictionary that is called a dictatorship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A huge wall should be built to keep all the drug runners, terrorist, criminals, kidnappers, gang members inside the US where they belong. </p>
<p>Really what kind of democracy allows an appointed official to just wave whatever laws he wants with no recourse? In my dictionary that is called a dictatorship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Concord</title>
		<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=969#comment-79459</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Concord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=969#comment-79459</guid>
		<description>Melissa -- how specifically do you propose that we secure our borders?  Or do you think our borders should continue to be open to every drug runner, terrorist, criminal, kidnapper, gang member, or anybody else who decides to cross?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Melissa &#8212; how specifically do you propose that we secure our borders?  Or do you think our borders should continue to be open to every drug runner, terrorist, criminal, kidnapper, gang member, or anybody else who decides to cross?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
