<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creationists Ready for Court Battle</title>
	<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=948</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sherrie</title>
		<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=948#comment-78074</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 21:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=948#comment-78074</guid>
		<description>If creationists are now considered scientists, I see no reason not to call astrolgers astronomers and alchemists chemists. 

If creationists want to call evolution a "theory," fine, although that begs the question as to what they think the definition of a scientific theory is. But why do they not also consider Genesis a theory?  If evolution is "unproven" as they claim, what is the basis for their assumption that Genesis has been proved? 

And what will be their policy toward students who reject creationism?  Will they flunk the class until they "get it right" i.e. become good little robotic Christians?  (Or maybe they'll be burned at the stake).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If creationists are now considered scientists, I see no reason not to call astrolgers astronomers and alchemists chemists. </p>
<p>If creationists want to call evolution a &#8220;theory,&#8221; fine, although that begs the question as to what they think the definition of a scientific theory is. But why do they not also consider Genesis a theory?  If evolution is &#8220;unproven&#8221; as they claim, what is the basis for their assumption that Genesis has been proved? </p>
<p>And what will be their policy toward students who reject creationism?  Will they flunk the class until they &#8220;get it right&#8221; i.e. become good little robotic Christians?  (Or maybe they&#8217;ll be burned at the stake).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texan For Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=948#comment-78063</link>
		<dc:creator>Texan For Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=948#comment-78063</guid>
		<description>I love the great state of Texas, where I have lived my entire life.  All of the religious lunatics in this state are making me sick, though.  This is a total sham!  Haven't any of these people taken a real science class?  Keep religion out of our schools!  I want my kids learning about real science, not what your church thinks ought to be science.  I thought this was the 21st century, not the dark ages.

And guy - keep on posting.  Assuming your post wasn't a joke, you expose the creationist lobby for what they are:  unintelligent, and totally unfamiliar with the basic tenets of science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the great state of Texas, where I have lived my entire life.  All of the religious lunatics in this state are making me sick, though.  This is a total sham!  Haven&#8217;t any of these people taken a real science class?  Keep religion out of our schools!  I want my kids learning about real science, not what your church thinks ought to be science.  I thought this was the 21st century, not the dark ages.</p>
<p>And guy - keep on posting.  Assuming your post wasn&#8217;t a joke, you expose the creationist lobby for what they are:  unintelligent, and totally unfamiliar with the basic tenets of science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter "Ski" Szymanski</title>
		<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=948#comment-78059</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter "Ski" Szymanski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=948#comment-78059</guid>
		<description>guy dawkins said:

"ICR has done some amazing work in the field of Geology, (sic) these (sic) have some great scientist (sic) (sic)"

Grammar and punctuation aside, "guy", and assuming your comment is not snarky spoof, how about enlightening me with the BEST example you can come up with of "amazing work" by ICR in the "field of Geology."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>guy dawkins said:</p>
<p>&#8220;ICR has done some amazing work in the field of Geology, (sic) these (sic) have some great scientist (sic) (sic)&#8221;</p>
<p>Grammar and punctuation aside, &#8220;guy&#8221;, and assuming your comment is not snarky spoof, how about enlightening me with the BEST example you can come up with of &#8220;amazing work&#8221; by ICR in the &#8220;field of Geology.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guy dawkins</title>
		<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=948#comment-77958</link>
		<dc:creator>guy dawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=948#comment-77958</guid>
		<description>ICR has done some amazing work in the field of Geology, these have some great scientist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ICR has done some amazing work in the field of Geology, these have some great scientist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Case</title>
		<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=948#comment-77955</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Case</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=948#comment-77955</guid>
		<description>What a fraud.  The degree should be limited to a degree in divinity.  Their views are religious views, not science.   To claim otherwise is a fraud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a fraud.  The degree should be limited to a degree in divinity.  Their views are religious views, not science.   To claim otherwise is a fraud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
