<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Fool&#8217;s Folly: Chertoff&#8217;s Mega Waiver</title>
	<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=897</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chertoff Challenge Denied by Supremes &#124; Texas Observer Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=897#comment-79410</link>
		<dc:creator>Chertoff Challenge Denied by Supremes &#124; Texas Observer Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=897#comment-79410</guid>
		<description>[...] April 1, Chertoff waived 37 federal laws ranging from the Antiquities Act to the Native American Grave Repatriation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] April 1, Chertoff waived 37 federal laws ranging from the Antiquities Act to the Native American Grave Repatriation [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Border Wall Battle Not Over Yet &#124; Texas Observer Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=897#comment-74038</link>
		<dc:creator>Border Wall Battle Not Over Yet &#124; Texas Observer Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 01:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=897#comment-74038</guid>
		<description>[...] her back yard. The Observer wrote about her struggle in our Holes in the Wall story and in previous blogs. For several weeks it seemed she had a compelling case that might at least force Homeland Security [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] her back yard. The Observer wrote about her struggle in our Holes in the Wall story and in previous blogs. For several weeks it seemed she had a compelling case that might at least force Homeland Security [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chertoff&#8217;s Congressional Challengers &#124; Texas Observer Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=897#comment-73682</link>
		<dc:creator>Chertoff&#8217;s Congressional Challengers &#124; Texas Observer Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 22:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=897#comment-73682</guid>
		<description>[...] has been signed for the 22-mile border fence-levee project to be built in Hidalgo County. In an Observer blog last week, Chertoff explained his reasons for filing the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] has been signed for the 22-mile border fence-levee project to be built in Hidalgo County. In an Observer blog last week, Chertoff explained his reasons for filing the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S Nicol</title>
		<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=897#comment-73521</link>
		<dc:creator>S Nicol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 17:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=897#comment-73521</guid>
		<description>This represents an unprecedented abuse of authority on Secretary Chertoff’s part, and clearly demonstrates the need for an immediate repeal of section 102 of the Real ID Act.  Obeying the law is not voluntary, it is mandatory, and Secretary Chertoff cannot claim that he is sweeping aside a host of laws on the border in defense of immigration laws.  In a nation of laws all laws must be respected, not just those that are convenient.

Equal protection under the law is meant to be a fundamental right shared by every American, but the Real ID Act makes the legal rights of citizens who live near the border conditional on Secretary Chertoff’s whims.  Section 102 of the Real ID Act of 2005 states, “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall have the authority to waive all legal requirements such Secretary, in such Secretary’s sole discretion, determines necessary to ensure expeditious construction of the barriers and roads under this section.”  No one else is granted this extreme power under any circumstance.  The president cannot waive our nation’s laws even in times of national crisis, and Secretary Chertoff cannot waive the laws that protect citizens who live away from the border.  Only border residents may have their legal protections waived.

Chertoff said, "Criminal activity at the border does not stop for endless debate or protracted litigation."  The waivers are essentially an admission that the border wall will itself violate up to 36 federal laws, making construction of the wall a criminal act.  If Chertoff is genuinely concerned with criminal activity he should ensure that the agency that he oversees complies with the law.

The only reason for Secretary Chertoff to waive these laws is because he knows that the border wall will violate them.  In setting these 36 federal laws aside Secretary Chertoff sets himself above the law.  If congress allows unchecked power to remain in the hands of an unelected administration appointee they are complicit in fundamentally undermining the rule of law.  Leaving the Real ID Act on the books and allowing Chertoff’s waivers to stand sets a precedent that should outrage the American people.  If our nation’s laws can be set aside to build a border wall today, they may be similarly set aside for whatever crisis politicians discover in the next election cycle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This represents an unprecedented abuse of authority on Secretary Chertoff’s part, and clearly demonstrates the need for an immediate repeal of section 102 of the Real ID Act.  Obeying the law is not voluntary, it is mandatory, and Secretary Chertoff cannot claim that he is sweeping aside a host of laws on the border in defense of immigration laws.  In a nation of laws all laws must be respected, not just those that are convenient.</p>
<p>Equal protection under the law is meant to be a fundamental right shared by every American, but the Real ID Act makes the legal rights of citizens who live near the border conditional on Secretary Chertoff’s whims.  Section 102 of the Real ID Act of 2005 states, “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall have the authority to waive all legal requirements such Secretary, in such Secretary’s sole discretion, determines necessary to ensure expeditious construction of the barriers and roads under this section.”  No one else is granted this extreme power under any circumstance.  The president cannot waive our nation’s laws even in times of national crisis, and Secretary Chertoff cannot waive the laws that protect citizens who live away from the border.  Only border residents may have their legal protections waived.</p>
<p>Chertoff said, &#8220;Criminal activity at the border does not stop for endless debate or protracted litigation.&#8221;  The waivers are essentially an admission that the border wall will itself violate up to 36 federal laws, making construction of the wall a criminal act.  If Chertoff is genuinely concerned with criminal activity he should ensure that the agency that he oversees complies with the law.</p>
<p>The only reason for Secretary Chertoff to waive these laws is because he knows that the border wall will violate them.  In setting these 36 federal laws aside Secretary Chertoff sets himself above the law.  If congress allows unchecked power to remain in the hands of an unelected administration appointee they are complicit in fundamentally undermining the rule of law.  Leaving the Real ID Act on the books and allowing Chertoff’s waivers to stand sets a precedent that should outrage the American people.  If our nation’s laws can be set aside to build a border wall today, they may be similarly set aside for whatever crisis politicians discover in the next election cycle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lila Knight</title>
		<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=897#comment-73455</link>
		<dc:creator>Lila Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=897#comment-73455</guid>
		<description>They pulled the trigger yesterday, April 3rd, publishing the waiver in the Federal Register. It is now official. Chertoff must not have liked the results of the EIS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They pulled the trigger yesterday, April 3rd, publishing the waiver in the Federal Register. It is now official. Chertoff must not have liked the results of the EIS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: April is the Cruellest Month&#8230; &#171; Smart Borders</title>
		<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=897#comment-73343</link>
		<dc:creator>April is the Cruellest Month&#8230; &#171; Smart Borders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 03:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=897#comment-73343</guid>
		<description>[...] is currently held up in negotiations, court cases, local protests, and wavering public support, but Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff ordered these waivers stating, “`Criminal activity at the border does not stop for endless debate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] is currently held up in negotiations, court cases, local protests, and wavering public support, but Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff ordered these waivers stating, “`Criminal activity at the border does not stop for endless debate [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
