<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Putting the Rs Back in Voter Fraud</title>
	<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=709</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=709#comment-71778</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=709#comment-71778</guid>
		<description>If there is NO real LAW as requiring a "drivers license" in the state of Texas, according to the Appeals court, than, more than likely there shouldn't be any laws reqiring us voters, an ID to vote!

If you all don't know what "freedom" means in your own Texas Constitution, and to live, vote, move about without government control, ie legislation, than maybe you all can go back and LEARN the Declaration of Independence, until you can QUOTE most of it, and not just skim it like you read it!

And after you LEARNED that excellent writing, than LEARN, not just skim, Murdock v Pennsylvania to SEE the rest of the TRUTH, about state "govment!"  Like the "no state can take a right, turn it into a privledge and charge a license and fee for it" [the right} SAVVY?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is NO real LAW as requiring a &#8220;drivers license&#8221; in the state of Texas, according to the Appeals court, than, more than likely there shouldn&#8217;t be any laws reqiring us voters, an ID to vote!</p>
<p>If you all don&#8217;t know what &#8220;freedom&#8221; means in your own Texas Constitution, and to live, vote, move about without government control, ie legislation, than maybe you all can go back and LEARN the Declaration of Independence, until you can QUOTE most of it, and not just skim it like you read it!</p>
<p>And after you LEARNED that excellent writing, than LEARN, not just skim, Murdock v Pennsylvania to SEE the rest of the TRUTH, about state &#8220;govment!&#8221;  Like the &#8220;no state can take a right, turn it into a privledge and charge a license and fee for it&#8221; [the right} SAVVY?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=709#comment-71777</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=709#comment-71777</guid>
		<description>Anyone who can't read, shouldn't be allowed in "government!"
If "you all" can read. . . explain these. . .        "The court has held that there is no such license known to Texas Law as a "driver's license." (Frank John Callas v. State, 167 Tex. Crim. 375; 320  S.W. 2d 360.) We have held that there is no such license as a driver's license known to our law." (Claude D. Campbell v. State, 160 Tex. Crim. 627; 274 S.W. 2d   401.) "An information charging the driving of a motor vehicle upon a public highway without a driver's license charges no offense, as there is no such license as a driver's license known to the law." (Keith Brooks v. State,    158 Tex. Crim. 546; 258 S.W. 2d 317) …"There being no such license as a "driver's" license known to the law, it follows that the information, in charging the driving of a motor vehicle upon a highway without such a license, charges no offense." ( W. Lee  Hassell v. The State, 149 Tex. Crim. 333; 194 S.W. 2d 400) Texas Court of Criminal Appeals</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who can&#8217;t read, shouldn&#8217;t be allowed in &#8220;government!&#8221;<br />
If &#8220;you all&#8221; can read. . . explain these. . .        &#8220;The court has held that there is no such license known to Texas Law as a &#8220;driver&#8217;s license.&#8221; (Frank John Callas v. State, 167 Tex. Crim. 375; 320  S.W. 2d 360.) We have held that there is no such license as a driver&#8217;s license known to our law.&#8221; (Claude D. Campbell v. State, 160 Tex. Crim. 627; 274 S.W. 2d   401.) &#8220;An information charging the driving of a motor vehicle upon a public highway without a driver&#8217;s license charges no offense, as there is no such license as a driver&#8217;s license known to the law.&#8221; (Keith Brooks v. State,    158 Tex. Crim. 546; 258 S.W. 2d 317) …&#8221;There being no such license as a &#8220;driver&#8217;s&#8221; license known to the law, it follows that the information, in charging the driving of a motor vehicle upon a highway without such a license, charges no offense.&#8221; ( W. Lee  Hassell v. The State, 149 Tex. Crim. 333; 194 S.W. 2d 400) Texas Court of Criminal Appeals</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Few Halting Steps Toward the Middle &#124; Texas Observer Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=709#comment-64722</link>
		<dc:creator>A Few Halting Steps Toward the Middle &#124; Texas Observer Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=709#comment-64722</guid>
		<description>[...] Tom Craddick had charged the committee with sleuthing out the scope of Texas&#8217; problems with voter fraud, and considering what, oh [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Tom Craddick had charged the committee with sleuthing out the scope of Texas&#8217; problems with voter fraud, and considering what, oh [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Voter ID Redux: Fraud-ier than Ever &#124; Texas Observer Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=709#comment-64660</link>
		<dc:creator>Voter ID Redux: Fraud-ier than Ever &#124; Texas Observer Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=709#comment-64660</guid>
		<description>[...] again: voter ID. They&#8217;re meeting today at the behest of House Speaker Tom Craddick, who charged the committee with studying voter fraud in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] again: voter ID. They&#8217;re meeting today at the behest of House Speaker Tom Craddick, who charged the committee with studying voter fraud in [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Robert BEHRMAN</title>
		<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=709#comment-56932</link>
		<dc:creator>John Robert BEHRMAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=709#comment-56932</guid>
		<description>In 2004, about 40,000 ballots were recounted in the VO-HEFLIN race here in Texas and each voter's credentials were examined in depth.

Only one non-citizen was found to have voted ... , as it happens, for the GOP candidate. That is a .0025% rate of infiltration by foreigners. 

He was a Norwegian under pressure at work to register and vote Republican. He was not prosecuted, however, because he had checked the box saying "I am not a citizen" only to be registered anyway by the Republican Tax Assessor-Collector.

In a voter registration and ballot qualification system already as suppressive and unreliable as ours is in Texas, the GOP "voter fraud" initiatives -- especially any more as involve computer technologies that the Texas Legislature clearly do not fathom -- could have unintended consequences and blow-back in both parties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2004, about 40,000 ballots were recounted in the VO-HEFLIN race here in Texas and each voter&#8217;s credentials were examined in depth.</p>
<p>Only one non-citizen was found to have voted &#8230; , as it happens, for the GOP candidate. That is a .0025% rate of infiltration by foreigners. </p>
<p>He was a Norwegian under pressure at work to register and vote Republican. He was not prosecuted, however, because he had checked the box saying &#8220;I am not a citizen&#8221; only to be registered anyway by the Republican Tax Assessor-Collector.</p>
<p>In a voter registration and ballot qualification system already as suppressive and unreliable as ours is in Texas, the GOP &#8220;voter fraud&#8221; initiatives &#8212; especially any more as involve computer technologies that the Texas Legislature clearly do not fathom &#8212; could have unintended consequences and blow-back in both parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
