<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meanwhile&#8230; Back at the Ranch</title>
	<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=638</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adventure, Choss, Newspaper, West Texas &#171; SendAustin!</title>
		<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=638#comment-76024</link>
		<dc:creator>Adventure, Choss, Newspaper, West Texas &#171; SendAustin!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=638#comment-76024</guid>
		<description>[...] more about this bruhaha, here&#8217;s a longer, newer Texas Monthly story, and some older, shorter Texas Observer coverage (more), or just google news, because every day there&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] more about this bruhaha, here&#8217;s a longer, newer Texas Monthly story, and some older, shorter Texas Observer coverage (more), or just google news, because every day there&#8217;s [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Somewhere Jerry Patterson is Smiling &#124; Texas Observer Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=638#comment-75162</link>
		<dc:creator>Somewhere Jerry Patterson is Smiling &#124; Texas Observer Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 20:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=638#comment-75162</guid>
		<description>[...] Patterson&#8217;s brusque promise of &#8220;No guns, no deal&#8221; on the proposed transfer of the Christmas Mountains to Big Bend National Park? Well, the AP has a story today that should cheer Yosemite Sam  Patterson: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Patterson&#8217;s brusque promise of &#8220;No guns, no deal&#8221; on the proposed transfer of the Christmas Mountains to Big Bend National Park? Well, the AP has a story today that should cheer Yosemite Sam  Patterson: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s Best For The Christmas Mountains? &#124; Texas Observer Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=638#comment-65396</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#8217;s Best For The Christmas Mountains? &#124; Texas Observer Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 07:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=638#comment-65396</guid>
		<description>[...] of Patterson&#8217;s most able critics is my colleague Forrest Wilder, who wrote first for the Observer about the proposed sale, and who has pointed out the weaknesses in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of Patterson&#8217;s most able critics is my colleague Forrest Wilder, who wrote first for the Observer about the proposed sale, and who has pointed out the weaknesses in [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Gibson</title>
		<link>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=638#comment-47144</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Gibson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/?p=638#comment-47144</guid>
		<description>As I remember the Christmas Mountains were acquired by the Mellon Foundation/Conservancy Group from a Corpus  bank with the intent to donate it to the BBNP.

The BBNP had recently acquired the Rosillas Mountain Ranch and had alot of opposition from a Trans-Pecos group who did not want to see any more private lands in public use.

The BBNP was not ready to take on the group again.

Several BBNP Supts later and now they seem ready.

The Mellon Group had no interest in keeping the land and then, and only then, made a deal with Mauro for the GLO to "warehouse" the land until the BBNP or the BBRSP were ready to accept.

The BBRSP was already stretched mighty thin budget wise and were in no position to accept.  About this time the Mellon Group had donated the Chinati Mountain tract to the BBRSP.  The Chinati tract is about 30 miles from the BBRSP.  

The TPWL did not, for many years, provide addl funding for an already strapped BBRSP budget.

Can not believe Patterson is hanging to the "Hunting and Gun"  issue.  It is so foreign to the rest of the covenants in the Deed, that I can not help but believe the "Hunting and Gun" issue was an inadvertant mistake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I remember the Christmas Mountains were acquired by the Mellon Foundation/Conservancy Group from a Corpus  bank with the intent to donate it to the BBNP.</p>
<p>The BBNP had recently acquired the Rosillas Mountain Ranch and had alot of opposition from a Trans-Pecos group who did not want to see any more private lands in public use.</p>
<p>The BBNP was not ready to take on the group again.</p>
<p>Several BBNP Supts later and now they seem ready.</p>
<p>The Mellon Group had no interest in keeping the land and then, and only then, made a deal with Mauro for the GLO to &#8220;warehouse&#8221; the land until the BBNP or the BBRSP were ready to accept.</p>
<p>The BBRSP was already stretched mighty thin budget wise and were in no position to accept.  About this time the Mellon Group had donated the Chinati Mountain tract to the BBRSP.  The Chinati tract is about 30 miles from the BBRSP.  </p>
<p>The TPWL did not, for many years, provide addl funding for an already strapped BBRSP budget.</p>
<p>Can not believe Patterson is hanging to the &#8220;Hunting and Gun&#8221;  issue.  It is so foreign to the rest of the covenants in the Deed, that I can not help but believe the &#8220;Hunting and Gun&#8221; issue was an inadvertant mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
